This week’s Cryptoart Question of the Week sparked some deep discussion around social media’s role in supporting artists, touching on four main themes: authenticity, discoverability, storytelling, and communities. Participants explored how platforms both help and hinder artists in navigating the digital landscape, revealing diverse perspectives on balancing creativity and visibility.
Authenticity suffers when artists feel pressured to use social media.
@ilannnnnnnnkatin brought attention to the tension between social media use and artistic integrity, stating, "Ideally, an artist should not have to use social media at all unless they were intrinsically motivated to do so." [1] This view raised questions about whether artists should feel pressured to engage with social media, especially when it doesn’t align with their creative goals. @sgt-sl8termelon reinforced this sentiment, expressing that social media "makes you a slave to content algorithms," underscoring how algorithm-driven platforms can conflict with authentic self-expression. [2]
However, @catswilleatyou provided another perspective, noting the benefits social media offers in terms of sales: "Social media helps artists in giving them an audience, and helps them get comfortable with 'selling' their work." [3] This highlights a key advantage of social media, even as it brings its own pressures, particularly when artists’ work goes unnoticed, creating a strain on mental health. This underscores a deeper tension: the push-and-pull between authenticity and the need to market oneself effectively.
Discoverability depends on algorithms that can limit visibility for emerging artists.
Discoverability emerged as a central issue, with participants highlighting how social media algorithms influence who gets seen. @hmtimm pointed out, "The algorithms that drive engagement tend to promote content that already has high visibility, favoring established names & trends while marginalizing emerging or experimental artists." [4] This critique reflects widespread frustration with new and emerging artists' difficulty in discovering their work amid a landscape that rewards already popular creators.
Yet, @ilannnnnnnnkatin offered a counterpoint, suggesting that some artists find success without relying heavily on social media: "Some artists do almost no social media and sell well just by minting their work on the platform." [5] This observation serves as a reminder that while social media can be a powerful tool, it is not the only way to reach collectors or build a career.
@catswilleatyou also weighed in on the economic challenges artists face, arguing that "social media SHOULD pay creators/artists for the content." [6] The current model, where artists often struggle to monetize their visibility, leaves many feeling undercompensated, even if their work reaches large audiences.
Storytelling on social media helps shape an artist’s public narrative.
Several participants touched on the importance of narrative in determining an artwork’s success. @bleu.eth asked, "Would the Mona Lisa be the 'Mona Lisa' if it wasn’t at the Louvre receiving millions of visitors a year?" [7] This question emphasized the idea that art’s value is often shaped by the story told around it, rather than just its inherent qualities.
This sentiment was further supported when @blue.eth discussed the rise of Da Vinci’s Christ with the Sphere, noting, "It can even not be -real- but with enough -incentives- everything can make sense for a narrative to be sold." [8] Their comment highlights how marketing and the narrative built around a work can sometimes overshadow its intrinsic merit, reminding artists of the power—and necessity—of controlling their own stories.
For many artists, this sense of control over their work’s narrative can feel out of reach, especially when social media platforms dictate how and when their content is seen. Participants like @hmtimm emphasized that algorithms tend to favor already popular artists, making it harder for emerging voices to be heard. [9] This underscores the broader issue that social media doesn’t just offer opportunities for exposure—it also shapes and limits the way artists present and manage their own stories in the digital space.
Community can thrive beyond social media when artists find supportive spaces.
Many participants expressed a desire for more supportive, niche communities where artists can thrive without the pressures of mainstream platforms. @ilannnnnnnnkatin suggested platforms could "cue up 4 or 5 casts a day of completely random selections of art from their platform," which would offer lesser-known artists better opportunities for visibility. [10] This would counter the dominance of algorithms and bring more equity to how work is showcased.
@hmtimm pushed for transparency in algorithms and advocated for more decentralized or art-specific communities. [11] These spaces, they suggested, could foster genuine artist-collector relationships and support creativity without the constant need for viral engagement.
Across the conversation, participants expressed a shared desire for environments where the emphasis is on building relationships and fostering creativity, rather than chasing likes or meeting the demand of the algorithms.
Through these discussions, a clearer picture of the complex role social media plays in an artist’s journey emerged. Balancing the need for discoverability with the desire for authenticity, leveraging the power of storytelling, and finding supportive communities were central to how artists navigate the digital age.
Notes:
