The idea of Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks, or DePIN, is capturing the imagination of people both inside and outside the Web3 ecosystem. It taps into a long standing frustration with how our infrastructure systems are built and maintained, and offers a radically different vision. What if critical infrastructure such as wireless connectivity, energy generation, compute power, environmental sensors, and transportation data could be owned and operated by the people who use it, rather than by governments or private monopolies? What if networks could be bootstrapped with community contributions, coordinated transparently with smart contracts, and maintained through open governance and programmable incentives? That is the foundational promise of DePIN, and it is a bold one. But like many promising ideas in crypto, it walks a tightrope between ambitious theory and uncoordinated execution.

To understand where DePIN is today, and where it might be going, we need to take a deeper look at its roots, the current wave of projects building in the space, and the challenges these efforts are facing in the wild. We also need to confront the broader questions about sustainability, governance, and mainstream adoption. This is not about simply swapping one set of technical tools for another. It is about rethinking how we build, who gets to participate, and how value is distributed in the physical systems that support modern infrastructures.

The Roots and Goals of DePIN

The foundational question DePIN is trying to answer is this: How can we build physical infrastructure that is more democratic, more efficient, and more resilient than what traditional models have delivered? Infrastructure today is highly centralized, often opaque, and deeply shaped by legacy financial models. Whether it is the deployment of 5G towers, renewable energy projects, cloud compute centers, or environmental data networks, the power to decide where, when, and how these systems are deployed tends to be held by large institutions. Access and participation are limited. Profits and data are consolidated. And even public infrastructure often ends up managed through public-private partnerships that are hard to audit and slow to adapt.

DePIN emerges as a response to this model, by using blockchain-based coordination tools, cryptographic identity, and community-governed protocols. Instead of a centralized provider building and operating a network, individuals or small operators contribute physical resources through hardware, bandwidth, energy, and data, where they are compensated for their contributions directly through programmable rewards. These networks can emerge organically wherever there is demand, expanding dynamically rather than top-down. They are transparent by design, and they create new forms of economic participation for people who have historically been excluded from infrastructure ownership.

This vision is not entirely new, as we have seen early versions of it in mesh networks, community solar co-ops, citizen science initiatives, and even decentralized file-sharing protocols. What is different now is the infrastructure layer for coordination, through the use of smart contracts, token incentives, decentralized governance, and open ledgers. Finally, there is a credible way to build these systems at scale. That is what sets DePIN apart from its predecessors, as it is not just a community effort, but an economic protocol for building the physical layer of future infrastructure.

The Emerging Landscape of DePIN Projects

A growing number of projects are building real-world infrastructure systems using decentralized methods, and their diversity is one of the space's biggest strengths. Let’s take a closer look at some of the most visible and innovative examples.

Helium is perhaps the earliest and most well-known DePIN project. Originally launched as a decentralized wireless network for low-power devices using LoRaWAN, Helium allowed anyone to purchase and deploy a small hotspot that provided network coverage and earn tokens in return. The Helium network rapidly scaled to over 900,000 nodes globally, building one of the largest public IoT networks in the world. Helium has since expanded into cellular networks with its 5G offering, using similar models to incentivize coverage and bandwidth availability. While the project has faced criticism over tokenomics, governance, and demand generation, it remains one of the clearest proofs that community-owned infrastructure networks can scale quickly with the right incentive design.

Hivemapper is another compelling example. It aims to create a decentralized mapping network that challenges the dominance of platforms like Google Maps. Drivers can install a specialized dashcam and earn tokens for collecting street-level imagery as they go about their daily lives. The images are then stitched into a global map that is permissionless and collectively maintained. As of early 2025, Hivemapper had over 25,000 contributors and had mapped more than 1.2 million kilometers of road. The advantage here is twofold. First, it dramatically lowers the cost of gathering map data. Second, it decentralizes control over that data and rewards contributors directly rather than extracting value from them.

WeatherXM is building a decentralized network of weather stations that aim to fill gaps in existing meteorological data. By incentivizing individuals to deploy weather hardware in under-monitored areas, especially in rural and Global South regions, WeatherXM offers a new model for generating climate data that is open, auditable, and far more geographically diverse than traditional systems. In early trials, the project demonstrated significant improvements in local weather modeling and storm forecasting. Their open data portal is already being used by climate researchers, agricultural planners, and even insurance companies seeking more granular insights into regional weather trends.

Akash Network and Render Network are both focused on decentralized compute power. Akash allows anyone to contribute idle compute capacity to a decentralized cloud marketplace. This offers an alternative to hyperscale cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud, with the goal of reducing costs and increasing resilience through distributed supply. Render takes a similar approach but focuses specifically on GPU rendering, catering to industries like film, animation, and AI. These networks have seen early adoption among indie studios and developers who are priced out of traditional cloud solutions. Render, in particular, has facilitated large-scale rendering tasks for major film projects by tapping into thousands of individual GPU nodes across the world.

DIMO is a mobility data network that enables drivers to collect and monetize telemetry data from their vehicles. Participants plug a device into their car’s diagnostic port and share anonymized driving data with applications, insurers, or city planners. In return, they earn tokens and gain access to insights about vehicle performance and usage. This stands in stark contrast to how mobility data is typically harvested, which is silently and without consent by ride-share companies, automakers, and app developers. DIMO makes that data explicit, user-owned, and portable.

There are also early-stage DePIN projects in energy, including Sunified and PowerPod, which are exploring decentralized energy networks built around peer-to-peer solar sharing and microgrid coordination. While still experimental, these models could eventually allow neighborhoods or rural communities to manage and monetize their own energy flows without relying entirely on utilities. Elsewhere, Grass is building a decentralized network for users to share their unused internet bandwidth with verified organizations in return for rewards.

These projects vary in maturity and scale, but they all share a commitment to a different kind of infrastructure logic. One that is not simply more distributed, but more inclusive, more composable, and more transparent.

The Growing Influence and Early Impact of DePIN

While the ecosystem is still emerging, DePIN is already having a measurable impact. The Helium network provides sensor connectivity in areas where commercial providers saw no economic incentive to deploy. Hivemapper has contributed map data in countries where mapping services were outdated or unavailable. WeatherXM has improved storm warnings in rural Greece and supported agricultural planning in parts of Latin America. Akash has helped developers in emerging markets reduce cloud computing costs by up to fifty percent in early tests. Render has shaved days off animation timelines for small studios. These are not just conceptual wins. They are real, operational improvements to critical systems.

DePIN also challenges the funding model for public infrastructure. Traditionally, infrastructure projects are financed through public debt, private investment, or complex multi-stakeholder partnerships. DePIN offers a different path. It treats infrastructure as a network good that can be bootstrapped by users and maintained with crypto economic incentives. That does not mean public funding becomes obsolete, but it does suggest new ways to allocate resources, onboard contributors, and adapt to demand in real time.

For instance, the use of quadratic funding or staking mechanisms can help identify which areas of the network are under-served or where demand is strongest. When mapped transparently, this data can inform decision-makers in ways that are much faster and cheaper than traditional planning processes. The feedback loops between users, contributors, and network operators become tighter, more responsive, and more accountable.

Challenges Ahead

Despite these gains, DePIN is not without serious challenges. One of the biggest is economic sustainability. Token rewards can bootstrap a network, but they cannot carry it forever. Projects must eventually generate real demand for their services, and that demand must translate into fees or alternative revenue models that can support contributors without endless inflation. Otherwise, the system collapses under its own weight.

This was one of the key criticisms of Helium during its initial boom. While the network grew rapidly, actual usage of the connectivity layer lagged behind. That led to a disconnect between token rewards and real economic value, creating a feedback loop that was ultimately unsustainable. The Helium team responded by pivoting to new use cases, partnering with telecom providers, and moving their infrastructure onto the Solana blockchain to reduce costs. Whether those moves will be enough to stabilize the network remains to be seen, but the experience is instructive for the entire DePIN ecosystem.

Governance is another major hurdle. Managing a decentralized infrastructure network is not easy. Decisions about protocol upgrades, resource allocation, dispute resolution, and security must be made in ways that are inclusive, efficient, and legally sound. DAOs offer a potential model, but many are still experimenting with how to balance transparency with agility, and decentralization with effectiveness. Token-based governance introduces risks of capture, apathy, and low voter participation. More nuanced governance models that blend onchain decision-making with offchain deliberation may be needed as these networks mature.

Finally, adoption beyond the crypto world is still a barrier. For DePIN to scale meaningfully, it must offer real value to users who do not care about blockchains or tokens. That means building user interfaces that abstract away complexity, offer clear documentation, integrate with existing tools, and establish partnerships with cities, companies, and communities that see DePIN as a means to solve real problems, and not just view it as a speculative playground.

Where DePIN Goes From Here

The promise of DePIN is not simply that we can build infrastructure differently, but that we can build it better. Infrastructure can now be locally informed, community-owned, and more transparent than ever. The road ahead is steep, but the tools are improving as modular protocol stacks, middleware, and interoperability frameworks are making it easier to launch and maintain DePIN systems. Cross-chain bridges and reputation systems are helping to coordinate contributions across networks. Real-world adoption will depend not just on better technology, but on better narratives and stronger institutions.

The next chapter of DePIN will be shaped by experimentation, policy engagement, and the ability to learn from both success and failure. Projects will need to adapt to local legal realities, partner with municipalities, embed resilience, and build toward long-term usage rather than short-term hype. There is no guarantee of success, but the possibility of an infrastructure system built by and for the people who rely on it is a vision worth pursuing. If DePIN gets even part of that right, the impact will be massive.

The future of infrastructure may not come from a government blueprint or a corporate balance sheet, but rather from thousands of contributors plugging in devices, sharing data, running code, and coordinating in ways that are open, fair, and responsive. That is the invitation DePIN extends, and it couldn’t come at a better time.

Join this Conversation within the Token Engineering Commons Forum. If you are interested in writing for the publication, giving your thoughts on an article, or wanting to engage in the future of real-world blockchain initiatives, please introduce yourself in the forum, or reach out to us independently.

Follow us on X, subscribe to our newsletter, or reach out if you’re exploring similar topics in your work. Let’s build what comes next, together.

Building the World Together: The Promise of Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN)