Collect this post as an NFT.
According to the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the global film industry showcased robust financial performance, reaching a noteworthy $98.5 billion in revenue in 2022—a substantial increase from the $84.2 billion recorded in 2021, marking an impressive growth rate of 17%. Projections indicate a continued upward trajectory, with anticipated revenues of $106.2 billion in 2023 and a further increase to $115.5 billion in 2024. This remarkable growth is propelled by several key factors, including the surging popularity of streaming services, the expansive reach of the global box office, and a rising demand for content in emerging markets. However, this flourishing narrative is not devoid of challenges, which we will now delve into, as well as exploring potential solutions. So, settle in, grab some popcorn, and get ready for an insightful exploration of the industry's history, current dynamics and its promising future. The show is about to begin!
Fundraising of a film dramatically affects various things such as size,scope,quality and distribution due to these constraints however it has almost completely eliminated the independent film maker which was the pioneer in bringing novel stories to the big screen. Further more if funds are able to be raised it usually comes from a big production studio house which opens up the film's original version to being corrupted due to meddling, such as we have seen in various amount of movies such as Sony and Spider Man-3 affecting Sam Raimi's vision of the film that made it bloated with too many villains to make sure there was adequate merchantable figures.
Lately, film audiences have been bombarded with a plethora of remakes, re-imaginings, and remasters of classic and not-so-classic films alike over the recent years, as well as agenda (equity)-based storytelling. Although this approach is, in good faith objectively, not conducive to enjoyability for viewers due to the redundancy of it, or creativity for filmmakers, as one should create the stories they want to create and not what a studio exploits them to make. Any good storyteller will tell you that you should make the story satisfy itself and not be particular about what the writer or any outside forces impose on it. It is also not good for box office ROI (Return On Investment) as the people who don’t enjoy these films are isolated and will not seek to watch them, thus reducing your target audience, which is always a negative from a financial standpoint. Although this is not surprising, as film has had a history of being used as propaganda.
The video below gives a good walk-through the decades of Propaganda
So why do we need Novel Stories? Novel stories and stories in general allows us to change our perspective on the world and change reality itself by conceptualizing a multitude of different realities such as an improved social or technological, reality in other words they give us hope for a better future and the will to go on and improve and even if we don't reach heaven on earth if we aim for the moon and fall short we are always going to be atleast off the ground and have created a pro-topian future as progress is growth and stagnation is death and good stories are always evolving as you wouldn't find it interesting if a main character ended up the exact same in the end as the beginning if that wasn't the intention but these stories don't necessarily need to improve either as a story which is a re-imagining of a historical event turned into the worse outcome can evoke feelings of appreciation and warning from an audience which in term can effect how we view and act with ourselves and others in society perhaps more compassionately as human beings are nothing more than a collection of stories and ideologies that we harbor within ourselves further more this idealization can inspire others that have the required skill-set to make it a reality as such is the case with genres such as science fiction it is with this you can extrapolate that imagination is as close as we can currently get to divinity and spontaneous creation. As well as expanding the worldview of the viewer which may not know a particular profession or problem exists which is not only informative to adults but particularly children growing up to inspire them.
Cultural Exportation Devices: Films have long served as powerful conduits for cultural exportation, offering a captivating and informative window into the most prominent facets of a civilization. This dynamic form of storytelling has played a pivotal role in contributing to cultural heterogeneity on an international scale, facilitated by digital means. Unlike earlier methods, such as localized immigration, films provide a broad, accessible platform for showcasing diverse cultures globally. This impact is significant, fostering the exchange of ideas and perspectives across borders. The ability of films to transcend geographical boundaries allows for the flourishing of new ideas and the influential interplay of cultures, highlighting their profound role in shaping a more interconnected and culturally rich world.
Cultural preservation Films, particularly those featuring historical styles, serve as invaluable time capsules encapsulating the ideologies and culture of their era. Beyond being treasures for the descendants of a specific culture, they hold universal significance for humanity. These cinematic snapshots become guardians of knowledge, preserving the essence of bygone times. In recognizing the profound value they carry, films become instrumental in safeguarding our collective heritage. The loss of knowledge, a consequence of neglect or decay, is akin to a grievous sin, emphasizing the critical role that these visual narratives play in our shared human legacy.
If you’re intrigued by the cultural facets of film, consider exploring Paul Skallas’ newsletter edition. It offers valuable insights into the intersection of film and culture, curated by the insightful Lindy Man.
Revenue Stream Reduction: DVDs used to be a significant revenue stream for mid-budget films. As consumers transitioned to digital formats and streaming services, the traditional sales of physical media declined. This reduction in revenue from DVD sales affected the overall financial viability of mid-budget films, which typically rely on a mix of box office earnings, home entertainment sales, and other distribution channels.
Changing Consumer Behavior: With the rise of streaming platforms, consumers increasingly prefer the convenience of accessing content online over purchasing physical copies. This shift in consumer behavior has altered the market dynamics, making it challenging for mid-budget films to achieve the same level of financial success they might have experienced in the era when DVDs were a dominant distribution format.
Shift in Distribution Strategies: As the demand for physical media decreased, film distributors and studios adapted their strategies to focus on digital distribution and streaming platforms. This shift often prioritizes high-profile, blockbuster releases on streaming services, leaving fewer resources and attention for mid-budget films. The emphasis on big-budget productions with established franchises has led to a competitive landscape that mid-budget films find difficult to navigate.
Limited Shelf Space in Retail Outlets: The decline of physical media has also affected the visibility of mid-budget films in retail outlets. With the reduction in the availability of physical copies in stores, mid-budget films with new and innovative stories may have fewer opportunities to reach audiences through traditional retail channels.
Impact on Marketing Budgets: Marketing budgets for mid-budget films are often more constrained compared to major blockbusters. In the era of physical media dominance, promotional efforts were often tied to DVD releases. With this avenue diminishing, mid-budget films may struggle to allocate sufficient resources for marketing, limiting their reach and audience engagement.
The decline of movie tie-in games, once a prominent marketing tactic for the film industry, can be attributed to a transformative shift influenced by mobile economics and the rise of perpetual universes, exemplified by games like Fortnite. This shift not only altered the dynamics of how games are created and consumed but also impacted the additional revenue streams generated through licensing the intellectual property (IP) to game studios.
Mobile Economics and Accessibility:
The widespread adoption of mobile gaming introduced a new economic model. Mobile games, often employing a free-to-play structure with in-app purchases, provided a more accessible platform for a broad audience. This accessibility contrasted with the traditional model of purchasing standalone movie tie-in games on consoles or PCs.
Perpetual Universes and Live-Service Models:
Perpetual universes, as seen in games like Fortnite, became a dominant force in the gaming industry. These live-service games operate as continuously evolving platforms with regular updates and events, fostering ongoing player engagement. This model replaced the episodic nature of movie tie-in games with a more seamless and persistent gaming experience.
Integration of Movie Characters into Live Services:
Instead of developing separate games tied to individual movie releases, the industry shifted towards integrating movie characters directly into live-service titles. This approach allows for the addition of new characters or skins coinciding with a movie launch, maintaining player interest within the existing game environment.
Continuous Revenue Generation in Live Services:
The live-service model offers continuous revenue opportunities through in-game purchases, microtransactions, and subscriptions. Unlike the one-time purchase model of traditional movie tie-in games, live-service titles provide an ongoing revenue stream, making them financially more sustainable.
Cost-Effectiveness and Revenue Distribution:
The cost-effectiveness of integrating movie content into live-service titles is notable. Movie studios can leverage existing game infrastructures, reducing development costs. Additionally, revenue generated within the live-service environment is distributed more evenly over time, aligning with the ongoing nature of player engagement.
Shift in Licensing Revenue Streams:
Traditionally, movie tie-in games involved licensing the film's IP to game studios, generating additional revenue. With the decline of standalone tie-in games, the industry moved towards direct integration, reducing the need for separate licensing agreements. This shift has implications for how studios monetize their intellectual property in the gaming sphere.
Contrary to the sunshine and palm trees often depicted by Hollywood, the industry's inner workings can be a formidable terrain. The glitz and glamour coexist with intense competition, demanding schedules, and a complex web of power dynamics. Success is earned through resilience, adaptability, and an unwavering passion for storytelling. So, as you step into this realm, be prepared for a journey that, while undoubtedly rewarding, is also a test of tenacity in an industry where the reel often contrasts sharply with the real.
One of the many prevalent issues the film industry experiences is favoritism of actors,directors,and producers even if they have a proven track record of box office blunders for example look at Kathleen Kennedy who has been ruining the star wars franchise and how those movies have been performing
Gatekeeping in the industry is also corrosive to storytelling has Hollywood has a cartel of major studio monopolies that for more or less determine whether your story is interesting enough instead of leaving that up to the consumer also as a result of this there is no new movie stars as casting is done by fishing in the same pool of established actors thus new talent does not get scouted and recognized as they did in the past and should be currently and the absence of new stars.
Addressing sexism and nudity for actresses in roles Exploitation of women has been running rampant in Hollywood for quite some time and it wasn't until the #MeToo movement that we knew to the extent of which we saw big name producers such as Harvey Weinstein be exposed for the monster he was this highlights an issue that women were not even being abused in roles but added unnecessary sexual scenes to the script to humiliate and degrade the actress for a shot at the big leads as well as objectification and flat personality roles that women are forced to play is a recurring and rampant issue many women encounter on the road to stardom
The decline of the traditional movie star due to big franchises not being character-driven there has also been the death of the movie star that has gone quietly not so quiet as it appears the days of the individual garnering all the attention and love when audiences as we saw in the 80s and before is no more as they have been replaced and reduced to the block buster franchises which has made them interchangeable "mantle" characters the repercussions is that individual actors have very few lines and have to share the screen with such a multitude of characters that they don't allow the actor to truly come into the spotlight and showcase their acting chops and just become the "new" superhero actor this also has the unintended effect of existing actors feeling forced they have to play a role in DC/Marvel movies to stay relevant and get paid the big bucks as that is where box office money is flowing
Overhead-The film industry grapples with significant overhead challenges, particularly in the realm of budget management. One notable contributing factor to the ballooning budgets of movies is the proliferation of CGI (Computer-Generated Imagery). The demand for cutting-edge visual effects has led to substantial increases in production costs, requiring dedicated teams and sophisticated technologies. Additionally, managerial costs, encompassing fees for agents, directors, and actors, have experienced an upward surge. The involvement of agents in contract negotiations introduces an additional layer of complexity and overhead. As A-list actors command substantial compensation, negotiating these high-stakes contracts becomes a delicate balancing act. The collective impact of rising CGI expenses and escalating managerial costs has only inflated overall film budgets
Bullying-The film industry's challenges extend beyond the exploitation of emerging talents to instances of bullying faced even by established names, as exemplified in the case of Quentin Tarantino during the production of "The Hateful Eight." Despite his stature in the industry, Tarantino faced significant hurdles, including script leaks and a hostile work environment. The screenplay for "The Hateful Eight" was leaked, prompting Tarantino to initially cancel the project. Moreover, the director faced backlash and mistreatment from various quarters, emphasizing that industry challenges are pervasive and impact filmmakers irrespective of their status.
Discrepant Wages: Following the conventional Hollywood model, it's not uncommon to encounter disparities in actors' salaries. While superficially justified by factors like an actor's status and prominence, this practice fosters a culture of interpersonal conflicts and inflates production budgets. A glaring illustration of this phenomenon is observed in movies like "The Lord of the Rings," where Kate Blanchett and Liv Tyler received significantly higher compensation than the protagonist despite having minor roles with minimal screen time. This imbalance underscores the need for a more equitable compensation structure within the film industry.
Unraveling the dynamics of Award Shows reveals a complex web of toxicity that extends beyond the glitz and glamour of the red carpet. The pressure exerted by award shows, from hosts being scared they are going to get slapped, to the stifling effect on creative freedom, has become a pervasive issue. Filmmakers, writers, and directors often find themselves conforming to a narrow set of expectations in pursuit of nominations, compromising the authenticity and diversity of their storytelling. Similarly, actors may feel compelled to take on high-visibility roles rather than exploring a range of characters and narratives. This pressure not only hampers the creative process but also contributes to a decline in award show viewership over the years.
As we delve into the economic evolution of film-making, the landscape reveals itself as a dynamic and transformative arena. Beyond the glamour of the silver screen, filmmakers must grapple with challenges and embrace innovations to stay afloat. Navigating this evolution requires a keen understanding of changing consumer behaviors, a strategic approach to distribution, and an openness to harnessing new technologies. In this ever-evolving economic tapestry, filmmakers must not only tell compelling stories but also adapt to a business landscape that demands creativity not only on screen but also in the boardroom.
DVD revenue's role in financial recovery after a box office failure DVD revenue historically played a crucial role in the financial recovery of films, especially in cases where a movie under-performed at the box office. When a film fails to meet revenue expectations in theaters, home entertainment sales, including DVD and Blu-ray purchases, rentals, and digital downloads, become a significant source for recouping production and marketing costs. However with the decline of home entertainment staples such as Blockbuster and other stores as well as consumer trends changing this is no longer a viable option to profitability of films.
Some of the ways they did led to profitability in the past though includes
Adapting to a trend of less TV consumption and cheaper alternatives The landscape of entertainment consumption has undergone a significant shift with the advent of streaming platforms, leading to notable changes in consumer behavior. The rise of streaming services has resulted in a substantial increase in TV consumption compared to traditional patterns, altering the way people access and engage with content. Here's how this shift has occurred and its impact on box office revenue
Home Entertainment Over Cinema: The accessibility and convenience of streaming platforms have led to a preference for home entertainment over traditional cinema experiences. Consumers can now enjoy a wide array of content from the comfort of their homes, reducing the need to go out for entertainment.
Changing Social and Leisure Habits: The shift towards consuming more TV content at home reflects changing social and leisure habits. With the convenience of streaming services, people can tailor their entertainment experiences to fit their schedules, contributing to a decline in the frequency of going out for movies or other forms of entertainment.
Impact on Box Office Revenue: The increased popularity of streaming services and a preference for home-based entertainment have had an impact on box office revenue. Theatrical attendance has faced challenges as consumers have more alternatives for content consumption at home. This shift is particularly noticeable for mid-budget films and non-blockbuster releases, which may struggle to compete with the allure of streaming platforms.
Economic Factors: Economic considerations also play a role. Going out for entertainment, such as movies, often involves additional costs like tickets, transportation, and potentially concessions. In contrast, streaming platforms offer a cost-effective and convenient alternative.
Global Reach of Streaming: Streaming platforms have a global reach, making content accessible to audiences worldwide. This widespread availability contributes to the globalized nature of entertainment consumption, impacting how studios strategize their releases and marketing campaigns.
Challenges with ticket pricing scalability: The challenges associated with ticket pricing not having scalability in the film industry can be multifaceted and impact various stakeholders, including both theaters and moviegoers.
Here are some key challenges:
Economic Disparities: Fixed ticket prices may not be inclusive of varying economic conditions in different regions or for different demographic groups. In areas with lower income levels, high ticket prices may deter potential moviegoers, limiting access to cinema as a form of entertainment.
Switzerland: $22.91
Denmark: $17.63
Saudi Arabia: $17.33
Finland: $16.43
Australia: $14.60
Sweden: $14.46
Norway: $14.06
Germany: $13.14
Austria: $13.14
Luxembourg: $13.14
Netherlands: $13.14
Ireland: $13.14
…
Market Dynamics: A lack of scalability in ticket pricing can make it difficult for theaters to respond to fluctuations in demand or changes in market dynamics. For example, during peak times or for highly anticipated releases, fixed prices may result in congestion, longer lines, and overall dissatisfaction among moviegoers.
Competition with Streaming Services: The advent of streaming services, with their subscription-based models and on-demand content, has intensified competition for the entertainment dollar. Fixed ticket prices may not provide the flexibility needed to compete effectively with the convenience and cost-effectiveness of streaming platforms.
Audience Behavior Changes: Consumer preferences and behavior are evolving, with an increasing emphasis on flexibility and value for money. Fixed ticket pricing may not align with the expectations of modern audiences who are accustomed to personalized, flexible pricing models in other sectors.
Deterrence for Families and Groups: Fixed ticket pricing can be a deterrent for families or groups planning to attend movies together. Affordability becomes a significant factor, especially when considering the cost of tickets for multiple family members.
Impact on Mid-Budget Films: Fixed pricing may pose challenges for mid-budget films, which may struggle to compete with blockbuster releases. The inability to adjust ticket prices based on the perceived value of the film or its production budget can affect the overall success of these films.
Limited Revenue Streams: Fixed pricing limits the potential for additional revenue streams beyond ticket sales, such as premium seating options, special screenings, or bundled packages. Scalability in pricing allows theaters to explore creative ways to enhance the moviegoing experience and generate additional income.
Seasonal and Regional Variations: Ticket demand can vary seasonally and regionally. A lack of scalability may prevent theaters from adjusting prices based on these variations, missing opportunities to optimize revenue during peak periods.
To address these challenges, some theaters have experimented with dynamic pricing models, loyalty programs, and other strategies to enhance the flexibility and appeal of their ticket pricing.
The economics of theaters play a crucial role in shaping the demand for increased marketing budgets in the film industry. Theater economics are influenced by various factors, and marketing is a key component in driving audience engagement and box office success. Here's how theater economics drive the push for increased marketing budgets:
High Fixed Costs: The operation of theaters involves significant fixed costs, including rent, utilities, staffing, and maintenance. These costs remain relatively constant, regardless of the number of patrons attending screenings. To maximize profitability, theaters need to attract larger audiences, and effective marketing is essential to achieve this.
Competitive Landscape: The film industry is highly competitive, with multiple movies vying for attention and box office success. Theaters, especially multiplexes, compete for a share of the audience's entertainment budget. Increased marketing budgets allow theaters to stand out in a crowded marketplace, creating awareness and excitement around their screenings.
Blockbuster Mentality: The economic model of theaters often relies on the success of blockbuster films. These high-budget productions are expected to draw massive audiences and generate substantial box office revenue. To capitalize on blockbuster releases, theaters allocate increased marketing budgets to create hype, drive ticket sales, and secure a competitive advantage.
Revenue-Sharing Arrangements: The relationship between theaters and film studios involves revenue-sharing arrangements, where a significant portion of box office revenue goes to the studio. To offset this revenue-sharing dynamic, theaters depend on concession sales and, by extension, increased attendance facilitated by effective marketing.
Dynamic Pricing Strategies: Theaters may implement dynamic pricing strategies, such as premium or variable pricing for different showtimes or seating options. Effective marketing campaigns can highlight the value proposition of premium experiences, encouraging patrons to opt for higher-priced tickets and concessions.
Digital Marketing and Online Ticket Sales: With the shift to digital platforms and online ticket sales, theaters need robust digital marketing strategies to reach audiences where they are. This includes social media promotions, email campaigns, and partnerships with online ticketing platforms. These digital marketing efforts often require increased budgets to stay competitive.
Enhancing the Moviegoing Experience: Theaters are increasingly investing in amenities and technologies to enhance the overall moviegoing experience, such as premium seating, advanced audiovisual systems, and special events. Marketing these enhancements is crucial to communicate value to potential patrons and justify potential price increases.
Counteracting Streaming Competition: The rise of streaming services poses a competitive threat to traditional theaters. To counteract this competition, theaters need to invest in marketing campaigns that highlight the unique aspects of the cinematic experience, emphasizing the social and immersive aspects of watching movies on the big screen.
The relationship between film studios and traditional theaters has undergone a shift in recent years, with studios increasingly launching their own streaming platforms. This shift has led to a certain level of reluctance and, at times, conflict of interest between studios and theaters. Here are key factors contributing to this dynamic:
In-House Content Production: Many major film studios have ventured into the realm of in-house content production for their streaming platforms. This strategic move allows studios to retain control over their intellectual property, experiment with diverse content, and build exclusive libraries to attract subscribers.
Direct-to-Consumer Models: Studios with streaming platforms can bypass traditional theatrical distribution channels, opting for direct-to-consumer models. This approach enables them to release content directly on their platforms, reaching global audiences without relying on third-party theaters.
Revenue Considerations: Studios operating streaming platforms benefit from a more direct revenue stream compared to traditional theatrical releases. With theaters, revenue-sharing agreements and box office performance uncertainties may impact a studio's earnings. Streaming platforms provide a more predictable and controllable financial model.
Changing Consumer Behavior: The rise of streaming services reflects a shift in consumer behavior. Many audiences prefer the convenience of on-demand content accessible from home, contributing to the success of streaming platforms. Studios may be inclined to prioritize platforms aligned with evolving consumer preferences.
Exclusive Releases: Studios may opt for exclusive releases on their streaming platforms, enticing subscribers with highly anticipated content that can only be accessed through their service. This exclusivity can be a powerful tool in building and retaining a subscriber base.
Conflicting Release Strategies: Theatrical release schedules and streaming release strategies can sometimes conflict. Studios may choose to release films simultaneously in theaters and on their streaming platforms or adopt windowing strategies that prioritize one distribution channel over the other. This can create tensions and negotiations between studios and traditional theaters.
Competing for Audiences: Traditional theaters and streaming platforms are competing for the same audience share. Studios must navigate this competition carefully to maintain relationships with theaters while also ensuring the success of their streaming endeavors.
Impact on Box Office Revenue: Studios' emphasis on streaming platforms may be perceived as a potential threat to box office revenue for theaters. The simultaneous release of films on streaming platforms could lead to reduced theatrical attendance, impacting box office earnings.
While streaming rights have become a significant aspect of the modern entertainment landscape, they can sometimes struggle to generate revenue for various reasons:
Subscription Model Challenges: Streaming platforms primarily operate on subscription models, where users pay a fixed monthly fee for access to a vast library of content. While this model provides consistent revenue, it can be challenging for individual films or series to stand out and generate substantial revenue on their own, especially for platforms with a diverse content catalog.
Revenue Sharing: Studios often enter revenue-sharing agreements with streaming platforms, receiving a percentage of the subscription fees or advertising revenue. However, the distribution of revenue among numerous content providers on a platform can dilute the earnings for individual films or shows, particularly if they don't drive high viewership.
Overcrowded Market: The streaming market is highly competitive, with numerous platforms vying for subscribers. This overcrowded landscape can lead to a "content glut," making it difficult for any single piece of content to attract significant attention and generate substantial revenue.
Limited Monetization Opportunities: Streaming platforms primarily rely on subscription fees or advertising revenue, leaving limited room for alternative monetization strategies. Unlike traditional box office releases that generate revenue per ticket sold, streaming platforms may struggle to find additional avenues for direct revenue tied to specific content.
Short Attention Span: The nature of streaming platforms, where users have instant access to a vast library of content, can result in shorter attention spans. This can impact the long-term revenue potential for individual films or series, as viewers may quickly move on to the next available option.
Lack of Adaptable Pricing: Unlike traditional box office releases where ticket prices can be adjusted based on factors like demand, streaming platforms often have fixed subscription fees. This lack of adaptable pricing makes it challenging to optimize revenue based on the perceived value or demand for specific content.
Piracy Concerns: Streaming platforms face challenges related to piracy, which can impact their ability to generate revenue from exclusive content. Pirated copies of films or shows may circulate on the internet, diverting potential viewers from official channels and reducing the revenue potential for both studios and streaming platforms.
Free Trials and Promotions: Streaming platforms frequently offer free trials and promotions to attract new subscribers. While these strategies can boost subscriber numbers, they may temporarily limit direct revenue from individual pieces of content during promotional periods.
Antagonistic Ownership: Streaming service subscriptions pose a challenge for individuals in impoverished nations, as ownership is gradually eroded. This shift transforms a one-time purchase, historically associated with tangible ownership, into an ongoing and potentially burdensome expense. The recurring nature of subscription fees contrasts with the traditional model of ownership, where individuals made a single purchase and possessed the content indefinitely. Moreover, as subscription prices have historically trended upward, this further exacerbates the financial strain on those in economically disadvantaged regions.
Switzerland - $13.34
Puerto Rico - $11.99
USA - $11.99
France - $11.63 Denmark - $11.21
UK - $9.70
Belgium - $9.52 Luxembourg - $9.52 Sweden - $9.04
Uruguay - $8.99
Czechia - $8.54 Saudi Arabia - $8.53
…
Despite these challenges, streaming remains a dominant force in the entertainment industry, and successful content can still generate significant revenue through licensing deals, merchandising, and international distribution. The struggle to generate revenue is often more pronounced for niche or lesser-known content in a highly competitive streaming landscape.
The impact of streaming services on the entertainment industry, particularly the rise of platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video, has significantly influenced the trend of in-house content production. Here are key factors contributing to this shift:
Content Differentiation and Exclusivity: Streaming platforms aim to differentiate themselves by offering exclusive and original content that cannot be found on traditional cable or broadcast channels. To achieve this, platforms invest in producing their own content, ensuring a unique library that attracts subscribers.
Building Brand Identity: In-house content production allows streaming platforms to build a distinct brand identity. Original series and films become synonymous with the platform, creating a sense of exclusivity and loyalty among subscribers who are drawn to the platform's specific style and quality of content.
Subscriber Retention: Exclusive content acts as a powerful tool for subscriber retention. By continually releasing new and engaging original content, streaming platforms encourage subscribers to stay loyal and renew their subscriptions. The ongoing production of in-house content contributes to the platform's long-term viability.
Creative Control and Flexibility: In-house production provides streaming platforms with creative control and flexibility. They can experiment with diverse genres, formats, and storytelling approaches without the constraints often imposed by traditional network television. This freedom allows platforms to cater to niche audiences and explore innovative content.
Global Appeal: In-house productions often have global appeal, contributing to the international success of streaming platforms. Original content can transcend language and cultural barriers, attracting a diverse audience worldwide. This global reach enhances the platform's competitiveness in the evolving landscape of digital entertainment.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Streaming platforms leverage user data to inform content creation decisions. Analyzing viewer preferences, watch patterns, and engagement metrics enables platforms to tailor their in-house productions to align with audience tastes, ensuring a higher likelihood of success.
Cost Efficiency and Control: Producing content in-house provides streaming platforms with cost efficiencies and greater control over production budgets. By eliminating the need to license content from external studios, platforms can allocate resources strategically, investing in high-quality productions that align with their brand.
Continuous Content Pipeline: In-house production ensures a continuous pipeline of content. Streaming platforms can release new shows and movies regularly, keeping their content library fresh and appealing to subscribers. This consistent flow of content helps platforms stay top-of-mind for viewers.
Awards Recognition: Original content produced by streaming platforms has gained recognition at major awards ceremonies, such as the Emmys and Golden Globes. This success not only enhances the prestige of the platform but also serves as a marketing tool, attracting both viewers and top-tier talent.
Adapting to Industry Trends: The shift toward in-house content production reflects a broader industry trend. As consumers increasingly favor streaming over traditional TV, platforms are adapting to this change by investing in content creation that aligns with evolving viewing habits and preferences.
Here is a video that dives deeper into movie economic models by ModernMBA
Disney's dual role as an entertainment giant and a legal powerhouse has shaped its approach to content creation and revenue generation. The company's diversified portfolio, including theme parks, merchandise, media networks, and legal expertise, provides multiple revenue streams. While this diversification offers financial stability, it has also led to observations that Disney may prioritize established franchises and formulaic storytelling, potentially reducing incentives for groundbreaking films. Here's an exploration of these dynamics:
Diversified Revenue Streams: Disney's financial stability is supported by revenue from theme parks, merchandise, media networks (including ABC and ESPN), and its streaming service, Disney+. This diversified approach allows Disney to navigate industry fluctuations and maintain profitability through various channels.
Theme Parks and Merchandising: The success of Disney's films is not solely tied to box office performance, as theme parks and merchandise sales contribute significantly. The synergy between films and other business segments ensures that a film's impact extends beyond theaters.
Media Networks: Ownership of media networks provides additional revenue streams, with film content being repurposed across various platforms. The success of the film division is not solely dependent on traditional box office numbers.
Multiple Intellectual Properties (IPs) has significantly altered the landscape of content creation, particularly in the film industry. The abundance of existing IPs has reduced the perceived need for original content, leading to a phenomenon known as superhero saturation. This trend is notably observable in the box office numbers, where a substantial portion of successful films belongs to the superhero genre.
Streaming Service (Disney+): The launch of Disney+ diversifies Disney's revenue sources and aligns with changing consumer preferences. Disney+ serves as a direct-to-consumer channel for both its extensive content library and new releases.
Legal Expertise: Disney's legal prowess ensures effective protection of its intellectual properties and favorable negotiation of contracts. This legal strength is a strategic asset in managing the complexities of the entertainment industry.
However, the perception exists that Disney, with its multiple revenue streams and legal strength, may prioritize established franchises over creative risk-taking in film production. This approach, some argue, could potentially limit incentives for the creation of groundbreaking or unconventional films. However some Indie Hollywood studios continue to experiment and push the envelope further such as A24 which has seen rapid success because of it and has quickly become an audience favorite with the range of their produced films as well as being able to capture actors that still crave novelty in their careers and in some cases renew their career as seen with Brenden Fraser.
The issue of ownership rights and royalties in the film industry has been a longstanding concern, with instances where these rights are sometimes unfairly attributed to studios and other stakeholders rather than the original creators. Several factors contribute to this imbalance, often placing creators at a disadvantage:
Standard Industry Practices: Traditional industry practices have often favored studios and production companies when it comes to ownership rights. Standard contracts may include clauses that grant the studio significant control over intellectual property, including sequel rights, merchandising, and adaptations, limiting the creator's ability to fully benefit from their work.
Power Imbalance: There is often a significant power imbalance between individual creators, such as writers, directors, and actors, and the powerful studios. Negotiating favorable terms in contracts can be challenging for individuals, especially those who may be relatively unknown or lack significant bargaining power.
Work-for-Hire Arrangements: In many cases, creators may be hired on a work-for-hire basis, meaning that the rights to their work are owned by the employer (studio or production company). This arrangement is common in the industry, but it can result in creators surrendering significant control and potential earnings.
Lack of Transparency: The complex nature of contracts and the lack of transparency in some dealings contribute to creators not fully understanding the implications of the agreements they sign. Studios may exploit this lack of clarity to secure more favorable terms.
Industry Norms: Industry norms and precedents can further perpetuate the unfair distribution of ownership rights. If it becomes standard for studios to retain certain rights, it may be challenging for individual creators to negotiate different terms without significant leverage.
Financial Pressure on Creators: Creators, particularly those early in their careers, may face financial pressure that leads them to accept unfavorable terms in contracts. The desire to see their work produced or to establish themselves in the industry can sometimes lead creators to compromise on ownership rights.
Evolution of Projects: The collaborative nature of filmmaking often involves multiple contributors, including writers, directors, and actors. Determining the rightful ownership and royalties for each contributor becomes complex, and some may find themselves with a smaller share than they believe they deserve.
Legacy Disputes: Over time, disputes may arise over ownership rights, especially when it comes to the exploitation of intellectual property in new formats or mediums. Creators may find themselves battling studios for control over their original works.
The shift to paywalled platforms via streaming, coupled with data-driven content serving, has indeed transformed the dynamics of content creation and led to instances of show cancellations, both on original television stations and streaming platforms. While this evolution brings certain benefits, it can also be a net negative for subscribers of these platforms for several reasons:
Disrupted Viewer Engagement: Abrupt cancellations disrupt viewer engagement, leaving subscribers invested in a show without a satisfying conclusion. This can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction among subscribers who have invested time in following a series.
Loss of Diverse Content: The rapid turnover of shows on streaming platforms may result in the loss of diverse content. As platforms prioritize new and potentially more marketable shows, niche or unique content that appeals to specific viewer demographics may be sacrificed.
Quality vs. Quantity Dilemma: The focus on data-driven decision-making may prioritize quantity over quality. Streaming platforms may opt for a high volume of content turnover, potentially at the expense of well-crafted, enduring shows that resonate with audiences over the long term.
Subscription Cost Considerations: Subscribers often choose a platform based on the promise of a robust and continually updated content library. When favorite shows are canceled prematurely, subscribers may question the value of their subscription, potentially leading to churn or dissatisfaction.
Lack of Loyalty Incentives: The frequent cancellation of shows may reduce subscribers' sense of loyalty to a particular platform. If viewers perceive that their favorite shows are at risk of cancellation without proper closure, they may be less inclined to remain loyal subscribers.
Increased Subscription Churn: The constant turnover of content and show cancellations can contribute to higher subscription churn rates. Subscribers may be less likely to commit to long-term subscriptions if the platform's content offerings are perceived as transient and subject to abrupt changes.
Diminished Trust in Platform Stability: Subscribers may lose trust in the stability of a platform if show cancellations occur without clear communication or if popular shows are prematurely discontinued. This can erode the confidence subscribers have in the platform's content strategy.
Impact on Viewer Recommendations: Subscribers often rely on platform recommendations based on their viewing history. Frequent show cancellations can disrupt the accuracy of these recommendations, leading to less personalized content suggestions and potentially diminishing the overall user experience.
Financial Performance Perception:
Companies, including Disney, often face pressure to maintain a positive public image and investor confidence. Inflating box office numbers can create a perception of stronger financial performance, potentially boosting stock prices and attracting more investment.
Tax Loss Harvesting - One tactic employed by Disney and other major movie studios to bolster their financial figures involves the strategic use of tax loss harvesting. This practice entails canceling movies that are either completed or near completion, allowing the studios to capitalize on tax benefits associated with losses incurred during production.
Executive Compensation
Executive compensation in major corporations is often tied to financial performance metrics. If Disney's leadership is incentived through bonuses or stock options based on box office success, there might be a temptation to manipulate numbers to trigger these incentives.
Contractual Agreements:
Disney engages in various contracts, including those with talent, production partners, and distribution networks. Box office performance can influence the terms of these contracts. Inflating numbers may impact negotiations and provide a financial advantage in subsequent deals.
Market Competition:
The entertainment industry is highly competitive, and studios vie for attention, talent, and financial investment. Reporting impressive box office figures can give Disney a competitive edge, making its projects more attractive to audiences, talent, and partners.
Brand Perception:
A studio's brand image is closely tied to its perceived success. Inflated box office numbers contribute to the narrative of Disney as an industry leader, potentially attracting more audiences and business opportunities.
Potential Benefits:
Stock Price and Investor Confidence:
Positive financial performance, as reflected in box office numbers, can contribute to an increase in stock prices. Higher stock prices benefit existing investors and can attract new ones.
Talent Negotiations:
When negotiating with actors, directors, and other talent, a track record of box office success can provide negotiating leverage. It may result in more favorable terms for Disney in future talent contracts.
Project Attractiveness:
A history of successful box office performances enhances the overall attractiveness of Disney's projects. This, in turn, can lead to increased interest from audiences and business partners.
Web 3.0, is a paradigm shift in the way information is processed, shared, and interacted with on the internet. In the context of storytelling, especially cross-hierarchical and metamorphic storytelling, Web 3.0 introduces several elements that can redefine narrative structures and audience engagement. Here's how:
Decentralization and Democratization:
Web 3.0 is characterized by decentralization, meaning that content is not controlled by a single central authority. This decentralization allows for a more democratized storytelling environment, where creators from various backgrounds and hierarchical levels can contribute to and shape narratives. It breaks down traditional power structures in storytelling, enabling a more inclusive range of voices and perspectives.
Tokenization and Ownership:
With the integration of blockchain technology, Web 3.0 enables tokenization of content. Creators can tokenize their stories, characters, or elements, giving them a unique digital identity. This not only provides a mechanism for creators to gain ownership and control over their creations but also introduces the concept of digital scarcity, allowing for the creation of unique and tradable digital assets within narratives.
Smart Contracts and Interactive Narratives:
Smart contracts, self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code, can be utilized in Web 3.0 for storytelling. This enables the creation of interactive narratives where the audience's choices trigger specific outcomes. Cross-hierarchical storytelling can be facilitated as users, regardless of their background or status, can actively participate in shaping the direction of the story.
Dynamic and Evolving Narratives:
Metamorphic storytelling involves narratives that can evolve and adapt based on user interactions, preferences, or real-world events. Web 3.0, with its decentralized and dynamic nature, allows for narratives to respond in real-time to audience feedback, creating a more personalized and engaging storytelling experience.
Immutable Record of Stories:
Blockchain technology ensures an immutable record of transactions and interactions. In the context of storytelling, this means that the history and evolution of a narrative can be transparently recorded. This transparency can build trust among the audience, making them active participants in the creation and evolution of stories.
Cross-Medium Integration:
Web 3.0 enables seamless integration across various mediums. A story can extend beyond traditional boundaries, incorporating elements from different media such as video, audio, virtual reality, and more. This cross-medium integration enhances the immersive nature of narratives and provides creators with a broader canvas for storytelling.
Community Engagement and Collaboration:
The decentralized nature of Web 3.0 fosters community engagement and collaboration. Creators can collaborate with their audience or other creators in the development of narratives. Cross-hierarchical storytelling becomes more accessible as contributors from different backgrounds can collaborate on shared storytelling projects.
Web 3.0 not only revolutionizes the film industry but also offers a transformative avenue for musical artists and the discovery of them. Native platforms on Web 3.0 such as Audius and Sound.xyz provide opportunities for musicians to contribute to movie soundtracks and secure exclusives. This not only diversifies the creative landscape but also holds the potential to positively impact the lives of artists by broadening their reach and opportunities.
Transparent Payments: Solutions emerge as a pivotal use case for the transformative impact of web 3.0 on the film industry. By facilitating real-time or same-day compensation, these solutions ensure a level of transparency that allows all participants in the film to view their earnings, addressing a longstanding issue of fair compensation within the industry. The advent of web 3.0 technologies introduces a groundbreaking approach to financial transactions in filmmaking, fostering trust and equity among contributors and addressing historical challenges in ensuring that everyone involved receives just and timely remuneration.
The Metaverse, offers unique advantages for reaching a global audience and providing a native, immersive experience. Here's how Web 3.0 enables native distribution in the metaverse and transforms the landscape of film-oriented marketplaces:
Decentralized Platforms for Native Metaverse Distribution:
Web 3.0 facilitates the development of decentralized platforms within the metaverse for content distribution. In these virtual spaces, creators can showcase their films, series, or immersive experiences directly to a global audience. This native distribution ensures that content is experienced in a seamless, immersive environment, similar to events like the Travis Scott concert in Fortnite.
Spatial Computing: breakthroughs in spatial computing have ushered in innovative ways of spectating, allowing entire scenes and their characters to be rendered in real time. This advancement enables viewers to immerse themselves in the scene as if they were physically present, experiencing a heightened sense of presence and engagement. The evolution of spatial computing not only transforms the viewing experience but also marks a paradigm shift in how audiences interact with and perceive cinematic content, ushering in a new era of immersive storytelling.
Content Delivery (CDNs) The inadequacy of existing infrastructure poses a critical challenge as it struggles to efficiently handle network demands, often resulting in crashes, particularly during periods of anticipated series releases such as we saw with “Stranger Things” on Netflix.
Data Protection: Streaming platforms, as seen in the case of Sony-owned Crunchyroll, can pose a threat to user privacy by engaging in the sale of personal data. This practice introduces an antagonistic dimension to the user experience, as sensitive information is commodified for financial gain. The incident with Crunchyroll underscores the broader concern about the potential exploitation of user data by streaming services. Another benefit of a decentralized CDN is the resilence to external network attacks that can steal consumer data such as was seen with Paramount's Parent Company.
Geo Locked Content: Streaming platforms frequently implement content restrictions based on geographical location, leading to a diminished selection size for customers. This practice limits the variety of shows available to users in specific regions, creating disparities in the content libraries accessible to different audiences. The imposition of these regional restrictions poses a challenge to achieving a comprehensive and equitable streaming experience for users worldwide.
Infrastructure Costs: Costs associated with delivery networks can exert a significant financial burden, potentially rendering operations unprofitable in certain regions. The intricate and costly network infrastructure required for efficient delivery services may present challenges, particularly in areas with lower population density or geographical complexities. As such was the case with Twitch in Korea that had to ultimately stop offering their services due to regulated bandwidth costs in the region.
Global Accessibility and Inclusivity:
Platforms built on Web 3.0 principles break down geographical barriers, providing global accessibility to content. Users from different parts of the world can engage with films and experiences in a shared virtual space, fostering a sense of inclusivity and expanding the potential audience base beyond traditional borders.
Circumventing Geographical Censorship:
Web 3.0's decentralized nature can potentially offer a workaround for the censorship challenges that traditional media faces in certain regions, such as China. By leveraging blockchain and decentralized platforms, content creators may find avenues to reach audiences in regions with strict censorship regulations, providing an alternative to centralized, censored distribution channels.
Tokenized Economies for Film-Oriented Marketplaces:
Web 3.0 introduces tokenization within film-oriented marketplaces. Creators can tokenize their content, allowing for fractional ownership, unique digital assets, and innovative monetization models. This tokenized approach can drive engagement, create a sense of ownership among viewers, and establish new revenue streams for creators.Managing cross-medium characters and the evolving concept of ownership
Web 3.0 platforms often involve community participation through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) or token-based governance. This community-driven approach empowers users to actively contribute to the promotion and marketing of content, reducing the reliance on traditional, costly marketing strategies. Fans become advocates, spreading the word about films within their networks.
Native Web 3 Documentaries:
Web 3.0 film introduces a revolutionary approach to documentary filmmaking by facilitating ecosystem-native documentaries that delve into the intricacies of the crypto space. A prime example is the Ethereum documentary, which documents the creation and evolution of the Ethereum blockchain.
Lowering Operating Costs Through Token Incentives:
Token-based incentives within Web 3.0 film platforms can significantly reduce marketing costs. Creators can offer tokens as rewards for users who engage with and share content, creating a self-sustaining promotional ecosystem. This incentivized sharing model leverages the enthusiasm of the community to drive organic growth and reach a wider audience without significant marketing expenditures.
Decentralized Rendering Infrastructure:
Platforms like Render Network offer decentralized rendering infrastructure, distributing rendering tasks across a network of nodes. This decentralization enhances the scalability and efficiency of rendering processes, allowing multiple tasks to be processed simultaneously during the production process
Reduced Rendering Costs:
Cost-effective rendering on decentralized platforms often translates to lower operational costs for filmmakers. Traditional rendering farms and services can be expensive, especially for independent creators with budget constraints. Utilizing platforms like Render Network allows filmmakers to access rendering resources at a more affordable price point.
Scalable Rendering Resources:
Web 3.0 films, especially those involving complex visual effects or high-resolution graphics, require scalable rendering resources. Platforms like Render Network provide the flexibility to scale rendering resources based on project requirements. Filmmakers can dynamically adjust their rendering capabilities without being limited by fixed infrastructure.
Token-Based Payment Models:
Some decentralized rendering platforms implement token-based payment models. Filmmakers can pay for rendering services using native tokens, introducing a seamless and decentralized payment process. This token-based approach may also enable automated and transparent compensation for those contributing computational resources to the rendering network.
Global Rendering Network:
Decentralized rendering platforms often operate globally, tapping into a distributed network of computational resources. This global reach ensures that filmmakers can access rendering capabilities without being restricted by geographical limitations. This is particularly beneficial for international collaborations and diverse film projects.
Increased Accessibility for Independent Filmmakers:
Cost-effective rendering on decentralized platforms levels the playing field for independent filmmakers who may not have access to the extensive resources of major studios. It democratizes access to high-quality rendering, allowing independent creators to compete in terms of visual sophistication with larger productions.
Decentralized Trust and Security:
The decentralized nature of rendering on platforms like Render Network enhances trust and security. Blockchain technology ensures transparency and immutability, providing a secure environment for rendering tasks. Filmmakers can have confidence in the integrity of the rendering process and the protection of their intellectual property.
Integration with Blockchain-Based Asset Management:
Web 3.0 films often leverage blockchain for asset management, including tokenized assets and rights. Cost-effective rendering platforms can seamlessly integrate with these blockchain-based systems, creating a unified and transparent workflow for managing film assets from creation to final rendering.
In the future i imagine a platform-based TV channels as investable entities represent a revolutionary departure from the conventional broadcast model, harnessing digital platforms and investment mechanisms to redefine the film and TV industry. In the context of Web 3.0, these channels operate as decentralized broadcasting hubs, providing a transparent environment for content creators and investors to directly engage. Tokenization introduces an investable aspect, allowing TV channels to issue native tokens or leverage blockchain-based tokens, transforming ownership and access into tangible assets.
The integration of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) aligns with Web 3.0 principles, empowering investors in decision-making processes and promoting community-driven governance. Revenue sharing through tokenomics ensures a fair distribution of earnings among creators, investors, and the audience. Investors gain access to diverse content portfolios, as each TV channel on the platform caters to specific niches or genres. The tokenized model incentivizes high-quality content creation, with the success of TV channels directly tied to the value of their tokens. Operating on Web 3.0 principles, platform-based TV channels offer global accessibility, fostering inclusivity among investors worldwide.
By reducing the need for intermediaries through blockchain and smart contract technology, these channels enhance efficiency and minimize costs. Innovative monetization models, such as special access tokens and limited edition content drops, further engage the audience and generate revenue. Most importantly, this conceptual shift has the potential to mitigate show cancellations through community support, as viewers and investors directly influence programming decisions, ensuring content aligns closely with audience preferences and fostering a collaborative and resilient decentralized TV channel ecosystem.
Cult Following: The amalgamation of community engagement and Web 3.0 technologies has demonstrated transformative potential, as evidenced in the Web 2.0 realm by initiatives like the dedicated fan campaign for the renewal of the Netflix series "Warrior Nun." This showcased the power of collective action in influencing content decisions. Additionally, within the Web 3.0 landscape, endeavors such as the Blockbuster Dao campaign emerged, aiming to acquire the once-prominent home movie retailer. These instances underscore the evolving dynamics of audience participation and decentralized initiatives in shaping the entertainment landscape.
Web 3.0 film festivals represent a transformative evolution in the traditional film festival model, leveraging decentralized technologies to redefine how content is curated, presented, and experienced. Here's an exploration of Web 3.0 film festivals and their potential impact on the film industry
Decentralized Curation and Submission:
Web 3.0 film festivals allow for decentralized curation and submission processes. Filmmakers can submit their content directly to decentralized platforms, eliminating the need for centralized selection committees. This democratization of the submission process opens up opportunities for a more diverse range of creators to showcase their work.
Tokenized Voting and Audience Engagement:
Tokenization within Web 3.0 film festivals introduces novel methods for audience engagement. Viewers may use tokens to vote on their favorite films, influencing award categories or even determining which films receive funding or grants. This token-based voting system creates a more interactive and participatory experience for festival attendees.
Immutable Records and Transparency:
Utilizing blockchain technology, Web 3.0 film festivals can ensure the immutability of festival records, including submissions, selections, and awards. This transparency builds trust within the film community, providing an unalterable record of the festival's activities and decisions.
Decentralized Funding and Grants:
Web 3.0 film festivals may incorporate decentralized crowdfunding models or token-based grants. This allows filmmakers to secure funding directly from the audience or decentralized funding pools, reducing reliance on traditional funding sources and increasing financial inclusivity for independent creators.
Global Accessibility and Inclusivity:
By embracing Web 3.0 principles, film festivals become more accessible globally. Anyone with an internet connection can participate, eliminating geographical barriers. This inclusivity allows filmmakers from diverse backgrounds and regions to gain exposure and recognition on an international stage.
Smart Contracts for Rights Management:
Smart contracts on the blockchain can be employed to manage rights and licensing agreements for films showcased at Web 3.0 festivals. This ensures that creators are fairly compensated for the exhibition of their work and streamlines the often complex and lengthy rights negotiation process.
Dynamic Festival Experiences in the Metaverse:
Web 3.0 film festivals can extend beyond traditional cinema settings into the metaverse. Virtual reality (VR) or augmented reality (AR) experiences within decentralized platforms create dynamic and immersive festival environments. Attendees can explore virtual venues, interact with other participants, and engage with content in novel ways.
Community-Driven Festival Governance:
Some Web 3.0 festivals may implement community-driven governance models, allowing participants to have a say in festival decisions. Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) or token-based voting systems enable festival-goers to influence aspects such as programming, themes, and overall direction.
Tokenized Access and NFTs:
Web 3.0 film festivals can leverage non-fungible tokens (NFTs) for ticketing and access. Attendees may purchase NFT-based tickets, providing exclusive access to festival content or even unique experiences. This tokenized access model enhances the scarcity and value of festival participation.
(NFTs) introduces an innovative approach to combat the decreasing attention span of modern audiences. This strategy involves the release of segmented distributions of a single movie, akin to the episodic nature of TV shows, strategically leveraging NFTs for viewer engagement. Here's how this model could work:
NFT Segmentation:
The film is divided into distinct segments, each representing a narrative or thematic unit similar to episodes in a TV series. These segments are tokenized as NFTs, creating a unique and collectible digital asset for each part of the movie.
Limited Edition NFT Drops:
The NFTs for each movie segment are released periodically in limited edition drops. This scarcity enhances the value of each NFT, creating anticipation and excitement among viewers as they seek to collect the entire set.
Tokenized Unlockable Content:
Each NFT serves not only as a proof of ownership but also as a key to unlock exclusive content related to the corresponding movie segment. This could include behind-the-scenes footage, director's commentary, or alternate scenes, providing added value to NFT holders.
Interactive Storytelling:
NFT holders may have the opportunity to influence the development of the storyline. For instance, they could vote on plot twists or character decisions, creating an interactive and participatory narrative experience.
Incentivized Engagement:
Holding the complete set of NFTs for a movie could offer additional perks, such as access to virtual events, Q&A sessions with the cast and crew, or even physical merchandise associated with the film. This incentivizes viewers to stay engaged throughout the entire segmented release.
Hooking Viewers for the "Next Episode":
The episodic release format, facilitated by NFTs, creates a sense of anticipation and encourages viewers to stay connected for the "next episode." This mimics the binge-watching experience of TV series, fostering viewer loyalty and sustained engagement.
NFTs cross mediums: NFTs, in the context of cross-medium applications in web 3.0, unlock a realm of possibilities by seamlessly integrating into both blockchain-based films and games. This interoperability facilitates a harmonious exchange of assets and narratives between distinct storytelling mediums. The use of NFTs transcends traditional boundaries, creating a dynamic ecosystem where the elements of blockchain-based films and interactive games converge, offering audiences a cohesive and interconnected storytelling experience. This interconnectedness not only enhances engagement but also marks a significant leap toward a more unified and expansive narrative landscape.
NFTs as characters In the realm of web 3.0, NFTs transcend their traditional role and take on the persona of characters, opening the door to licensing arrangements akin to the conventional “likeness license” for actors. Pioneering this innovative concept, web 3 native brands like Bored Ape have ventured into the uncharted territory of licensing NFTs as distinctive characters. This groundbreaking approach not only blurs the lines between the digital and physical realms but also sets a precedent for the evolving landscape of intellectual property in the digital age, where NFTs become dynamic entities with commercial value beyond their digital existence.
On-chain Rotten Tomatoes: A concept akin to “Onchain Rotten Tomatoes” emerges, offering a tangible proof of viewership recorded directly on the blockchain. Enhancing the viewer experience, this concept goes beyond conventional ratings by introducing on-chain highlights with live comments, reminiscent of SoundCloud’s timestamped comments. By incorporating blockchain transparency, this innovative approach not only authenticates viewership but also fosters an interactive community-driven environment where audiences can share insights, reactions, and discussions seamlessly integrated with the film’s timeline. This marks a transformative leap toward a more engaged and decentralized film-watching experience.
As CGI did in the past Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) for filmmaking represents a paradigm shift similar to the transformative impact of Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) in the past. Here's an exploration of how filmmakers can leverage AI to revolutionize the film industry:
Enhanced Creative Processes:
AI algorithms can analyze vast datasets of successful films, scripts, and audience preferences to generate insights into storytelling, character development, and plot structures. Filmmakers can use this information to enhance their creative processes, ensuring that their narratives align with audience expectations and trends.
Scriptwriting Assistance:
AI-powered tools can assist in scriptwriting by providing suggestions for dialogue, plot twists, or character arcs. These tools can analyze successful scripts, helping filmmakers refine their storytelling techniques and optimize the emotional impact of their narratives. Experimentation with such tools are already in production such as Avail's Script Summarization.
Virtual Pre-visualization:
AI-driven virtual pre-visualization tools allow filmmakers to simulate scenes and sequences before actual production. This helps in planning shots, optimizing camera angles, and visualizing the overall aesthetics of the film, leading to more efficient and cost-effective filmmaking.
Automated Video Editing:
AI algorithms can streamline the video editing process by automating tasks such as scene segmentation, pacing adjustments, and even color grading. This not only saves time but also ensures a more cohesive and visually appealing final product.
Deepfake Technology:
While controversial, deepfake technology powered by AI can be used for creative purposes in filmmaking. It enables realistic face replacements or de-aging of actors, as seen recently with Indiana Jones expanding storytelling possibilities and allowing filmmakers to explore narratives across different time periods.
Predictive Analytics for Audience Engagement:
AI-driven predictive analytics can analyze audience behaviors and preferences, aiding filmmakers in tailoring their content for maximum engagement. This includes optimizing marketing strategies, release schedules, and even adapting the storyline based on anticipated audience reactions.
AI-Generated Soundtracks:
AI algorithms can compose original soundtracks based on the emotional tone of a film. This not only provides filmmakers with unique musical compositions but also offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional composers.
Dynamic Content Personalization:
AI can enable dynamic content personalization, allowing filmmakers to create interactive and personalized experiences for viewers. This could include branching narratives, alternate endings, or customized viewing experiences based on individual preferences.
Efficient Post-Production Processes:
AI can enhance post-production tasks such as visual effects rendering, reducing the time and resources required for complex CGI. This efficiency enables filmmakers to focus on creative aspects rather than getting bogged down by technical challenges.
AI-Enhanced Animation:
In animation, AI algorithms can improve character animation by learning from real-world movement patterns. This creates more realistic and nuanced animations, enhancing the overall quality of animated films.
AI-Generated Storyboarding:
AI tools can assist in the creation of storyboards by suggesting visual compositions and shot sequences based on the script. This aids filmmakers in visualizing scenes more effectively during the pre-production phase.
Cost Reduction: All of the previous mentioned points compound into significant cost reduction for the entire flimmaking process thus the average feature flim costs upwards to 50 million
Dreamworks co-founder Jeff Katzenberg says AI will cut cost of animation movies by 90% within the next three years: “In the good old days, you might need 500 artists and years to make a world-class animated movie. I don’t think it will take 10% of that three years from now.”
The 2023 Hollywood writers' and actors' strikes were two separate labor actions that took place in the spring and summer of 2023. The strikes were the first major work stoppages in Hollywood since the 2007-2008 Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike.
WGA Strike
The WGA strike began on May 2, 2023, after the guild's members voted overwhelmingly to reject the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers' (AMPTP) latest contract offer. The WGA was seeking increased residuals for streaming shows, as well as protections against the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate scripts.
The strike had a significant impact on the television industry, as it forced the cancellation or postponement of production on many popular shows.
The strike ended on October 3, 2023, after the WGA and AMPTP reached a tentative agreement. The agreement included increased residuals for streaming shows, as well as a joint committee to study the use of AI in screenwriting.
SAG-AFTRA Strike
The SAG-AFTRA strike began on July 18, 2023, after the guild's members voted to reject the AMPTP's latest contract offer. SAG-AFTRA was seeking increased residuals for streaming shows, as well as better health and pension benefits.
The SAG-AFTRA strike had a smaller impact on the television industry than the WGA strike, as many shows had already completed production for the fall season. However, the strike did have a significant impact on the film industry, as it forced the cancellation or postponement of production on many films.
The SAG-AFTRA strike ended on September 27, 2023, after the guild and AMPTP reached a tentative agreement. The agreement included increased residuals for streaming shows, as well as improved health and pension benefits for older members.
Envisioning the future, a Filmmaker DAO emerges as a formidable force designed to safeguard and oversee all participants in the filmmaking process. Utilizing cutting-edge tools like zero-knowledge (zk) voting, and multi-sig treasuries this DAO becomes a democratic powerhouse, preventing potential abuse of funds during the flimmaking process that sometimes can be seen while also allowing stakeholders to collectively address issues, particularly those related to potential exploitation and creative direction. By incorporating transparent decision-making processes, the Filmmaker DAO seeks to establish a fair and secure environment that ultimately translates into better movies for audiences.
Thank you for taking the time to engage with our content. If you've found value in what you've read, we invite you to subscribe to our blog or newsletter to stay updated on the latest articles and insights. Your support and continued engagement are greatly appreciated.
2,874
