ChainGPT

NFTs have become a vector of value creation for artists, communities, and even corporations.

New Industries are being born and old ones are being transformed into their digital equivalents through the application of NFTs.

Entrepreneurs of from all walks of like are looking to integrate NFTs into their project supply chains to strengthen the relationships with their communities and expand their product suites. However, creating NFT collections manually is extremely costly in time, effort, and money.

First, an adequate, talented artist must be found and retained.

Then, the artist must spend weeks, if not months, creating the art.

Then, that art must be inspected and in 99.9% of cases revised.

Finally, that art must be tagged, organized, and uploaded.

Costs can run into the tens, even hundreds of thousands of dollars and consume months to complete.

These overheads have been deterring talented, brilliant people from participating in the digital economy.

ChainGPT has just changed this paradigm; leveled the playing field and empowered an entirely new caliber of digital entrepreneurs with the most powerful generator in the Web3 industry.

Transforming simple text into captivating, high-fidelity images, the ChainGPT NFT generator utilizes cutting-edge AI technology to convert ideas into tangible, visual, products.

Condensing months into minutes, ChainGPT’s AI NFT generator has been purposefully designed to be as simple and intuitive as possible.

Creating NFTs in the ChainGPT AI NFT Generator comes in two distinct formats:

Best for results that require individual super specific attention. Be it for an artist to express their thoughts or feelings through a visual medium or a business that needs abstract imagery for its content, ChainGPT’s single NFT generator option caters to the most complex demands with the highest quality results.

The second option of generating collections is optimized to serve use cases where large batches of unique art are required. Some of the most prominent collection applications are for Ticketing and community building. Rather than having to mass print un-inspiring, redundant copies of tickets, it is possible to provide your audience with unique, yet distinguishable designs for their tickets. As it relates to the building on communities, collections that are bread from a single prompt will carry the essence of a community uniformly throughout all of its pieces; in turn creating a visual bond that unites all of its members under the same principle.

* Collections size will vary with a maximum cap at 10,000 images per request.

The ChainGPT AI NFT generator is built to compliment the most abstract thinkers and realize the imaginations of the most arbitrary concepts. There is no hardcoded universal framework for perfect prompting; the best prompt are those that produce desired results.

However, as a rule of thumb, remember, the more accurate and descriptive the prompt provided, the more accurate the outcome will be.

Anything as concrete and straightforward as: 

“Obsidian God Wearing Jewelry in a Mansion”

We invite users to play around with the generator in order to get a sense of how it will interpret their ideas.

* Spelling and grammar: don’t worry, the ChainGPT AI is as advanced a model as possible, the NLP (Natural Language Processing) will be able to comprehend linguistic nuances.

In order to truly make this technology accessible to a wider audience, the borders to entry must be lowered. Understanding this, ChainGPT has specifically designed a cost structure for the NFT generator that is an order of magnitude more affordable.

V1 pricing will be based on a similar model to general product usage.

Free for a limited time only, stop by now to experience the transformative power of the ChainGPT AI NFT Generator: 

ChainGPT AI NFT Generator — Prototype Release

The Future, Today!

Creating solutions based on technological developments has been our practice as a graduate of a technical field. The unending pursuit of convenience, efficiency, and optimization drives technological development faster than imagined. So today, I will share the advantages and disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through Simsimi. Furthermore, I will break down the different methodologies and techniques of AI to shed light on how you can contribute to developing AI safely. 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a technology that has been around since the 1940s, developing mathematical and computer models. The latest advancements in computing power and access to data from computers led to more widespread use of AI in 2010. An example of the widespread adoption of AI is Simsimi, onboarding a user base of 400 million users worldwide.

SimSimi is one of the longest-running AI chatbots that engage in small talks or emotional talks with users using playful language. Originally developed to engage and extend emotional support to users, this product took an unfortunate turn as the AI model was corrupted with offensive language and sexual content. 

Ultimately, developing an AI product for mass adoption should follow strict guidelines centered on human rights. Nevertheless, the capability of AI to transform various industries is limitless. Industries including healthcare, manufacturing, agriculture, transportation, finance, education, entertainment, and many more would benefit from the technology. 

AI integration in blockchain technology is being explored with SingularityNET, a decentralized AI marketplace built on Ethereum. The technology interacts with and provides AI services such as facilitating payments and translation. The project has a long-term vision of open-sourcing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). 

Unlocking the endless possibilities with AI starts with understanding the methodologies and techniques used to develop it.

Technology is great but, this does not mean it's fail-proof. Just like humans, technology is prone to mistakes. And this is the reason why safe and continuous AI development should take place to onboard mass adoption. With your understanding of the different methodologies and approaches of AI, you can help developers pinpoint problems and debug them. 

How you can contribute to developing Artificial Intelligence

Safe Artificial Intelligence Development

ethstaker

Ethereum is built to be a robust and resilient network with 100% uptime. In order to achieve this, any central point of failure is identified, addressed, researched, and mitigated. Decentralization of these points of failure is a multifaceted problem that requires active and ongoing attention at every layer of the stack, including but not limited to geography, software implementations, hardware in use, block building methods, staking pool protocol dominance, etc.

Ethereum client diversity is a focus of the staking community, especially among those who run nodes. Maximizing client diversity benefits the network as a whole, keeps an operator’s investment safe and robust, and minimizes the potential of a catastrophic event due to an error in a single client, which would impact every entity: individual and commercial operators alike.

This document summarizes the current state of execution clients, especially at scale, and asserts that this state is more than sufficient to begin to push for diversification into two minority execution clients, Nethermind and Besu, for larger operations. 

Large staking operations would be prudent to consider diversifying their validators into a mix of execution clients and away from a Geth majority.

Brief history of consensus client diversity initiatives and effects

EthStaker initiated a concerted effort in late 2021 to inform stakers and larger staking operations of the vulnerability that was created by the Prysm consensus client supermajority that existed at the time. Prysm was a robust first-mover in the consensus client software arena but, by that time, Lighthouse, Teku, and Nimbus were on par with Prysm performance, and the supermajority represented an urgent threat to the beaconchain.

Solo stakers, who are generally very engaged, quickly began switching to minority clients, and many larger staking operations followed, committing to diversification. Data and testimonials from the EthStaker community that reported their experiences with these minority clients helped enormously. Prysm soon lost its supermajority while the presence of minority clients, especially Lighthouse, began to climb. Today we are at a much healthier, though not perfectly ideal, mix of consensus clients. With five viable and robust consensus clients, we would ideally see each at an equal 20% marketshare.

An incident in May of 2023 illuminated the potential vulnerability of unpredictable software bugs. An exceptional scenario caused many nodes to struggle to follow the chain and led to a delay in finality for four epochs on May 11th and for nine epochs on May 12th. The issue was assessed, diagnosed, and fixed by patches to the Prysm and Teku clients the following day. The full post-mortem can be found 

During these issues of delayed finality, transactions continued to be processed on the network with no effects felt by the end user. This was possible because Lighthouse had a different design approach and dealt with the situation in a way that Prysm did not (Lighthouse and Prysm currently represent ~75% of the network).

Had Prysm still been a supermajority, the effects of this bug would have been far more severe for both the network and stakers, who experienced an 

 for the first time in Ethereum’s history - this penalty affects non-attesting validators and grows quadratically over time. Validators that continued to attest (Lighthouse users) did not experience this penalty.

The current state of execution client diversity

Execution client diversity data is more difficult to assess than consensus client diversity data. The consensus client utilizes the execution client and publishes blocks, leaving fingerprints in the way that they order attestations, but the execution client doesn’t leave identifiable traces on-chain.

 to gather self-reported data from staking providers about the execution clients that they use. Some protocols (e.g. Lido) conduct quarterly surveys where this data can be found, some (e.g. Rocket Pool) make theirs visible through graffiti, and some have reported privately.

With 44.5% of the network self-reporting, Geth comes in at 86.8%, a worrying supermajority. Until now, EthStaker has made an intentional decision to not push for execution client diversity because of the state of the other execution clients - they simply weren’t robust or reliable enough to replace Geth, especially in commercial staking operations.

 there’s a bug either in a Geth release or an exceptional scenario similar to the one that affected consensus clients in May of 2023 arises on the execution layer. The likelihood of this arising is very small, but with Geth at an estimated 86.8% share of the network, this scenario would be catastrophic.

Recommended execution clients for use at scale

These recommendations are based on extensive testing on mainnet and testnets, within the community and reported by 

Cryptomanufaktur is a commercial node operator running thousands of keys for various entities and has been testing minority clients at scale for robustness and reliance in an effort to identify an appropriate time to push for execution client diversity and has shared findings with EthStaker. Ethpool by bitfly was known for running the largest Ethereum mining pool, Ethermine. Since genesis, they relied on Geth and Parity clients. However, after extensive testing and the recent shift of block building to relays, Ethpool has switched to running Nethermind for their thousands of keys.

EthStaker is confident recommending minority clients Nethermind and Besu for at-scale operation. While all three minority clients (Nethermind, Besu, Erigon) are being used in production with at-scale validation, Nethermind and Besu currently present the lowest risk.

Individual notes on currently available clients

The main advantage of running Geth is that it is reliable and battle-tested and has been shown to be robust under normal circumstances. It prunes offline and is working toward path-based state storage (PBSS), which will remove the need to prune entirely.

At its current supermajority status, the use of Geth presents a risk to both Ethereum as a whole and to the individual operator running it. This risk is discussed in the next section.

A recent release by Nethermind (v1.8) allows an operator to start attesting to blocks in ~1 hour, and download old bodies and receipts with better attestation in 4 hours. Nethermind can online prune and is also working towards PBSS.

Nodes running Nethermind were seeing an issue where the client would resource-starve a machine during prune, but this has been addressed and fixed in recent released by Nethermind and nodes running Nethermind are no longer experiencing this issue.

After the merge, there were reports that Besu was slow in processing blocks, causing missed attestations. This issue has been addressed and fixed by their latest releases. A current potential point of concern is that when it runs out of space, it needs to be resynced, which results in downtime while resyncing for that CL-EL pair.

Erigon is stable and robust with efficient syncing but is not yet recommended for commercial stakers or larger operations.

Erigon has a history of changing command line parameters in a breaking manner without warning. Additionally, when Erigon moves to their V3 and V4, the versions will require operators using their software to complete full resyncs from scratch. These are the primary reasons for not recommending their use in larger operations at this time.

The risk presented by an execution client supermajority

The primary focus of this memo is the risk associated with Geth, specifically the vulnerability it introduces through a supermajority. Should an extraordinary situation occur in a supermajority environment where validators using Geth are left isolated and operating on a separate chain, there is a significant monetary risk to the node operator running Geth.

 in February of 2022, developer Jonathan Cook (jmcook.eth) addressed the risk of execution client diversity in the context of consensus client diversity:

There are two significant numbers to look for here when evaluating the risk of a client’s dominance to the chain: 33% and 66%.*

33% of the network experiencing failure can prevent finalization of the chain - it is not catastrophic, but it does present a potential monetary loss for validators unable to attest correctly. This is the scenario that occurred on the consensus layer where affected clients represented more than 33% of the network.

In order to encourage adoption of the multi-client architecture that Ethereum utilizes to maximize its robustness, penalties are dynamic and are highest for highly correlated errors. If one validator goes offline, penalties are minor. In the case of a non-finalizing chain, where between 33 and 66% of the network are unable to attest and Ethereum fails to finalize for some number of epochs, the chain enters a “inactivity leak” mode, where non-attesting validators are penalized a quadratically increasing amount each epoch until they have leaked enough for the attesting validators to finalize the network or until client developers are able to diagnose the issue and release a patch for the affected clients.

This penalty is 1% of the validator’s balance at ~4.5 days, 5% at ~10 days, and 20% after three weeks, as outlined in a 

 by Dankrad Feist, a researcher at the Ethereum Foundation.

There are three types of bugs to consider for a failure by a client that is being run on >66% of validators on the network, outlined in Dankrad’s 

With the first (very unlikely) type of bug, all validators running the supermajority client would be slashed and penalized the 

 of their validator’s balance. With the second type of bug, they would experience the inactivity leak until validators running other clients are able to finalize with their increasing portion of the network.

With the third type of bug, validators running the supermajority client would finalize an invalid chain. At this point, the majority of the network would be following this invalid chain. This would throw the network into chaos because it would require an intervention from the social layer to decide whether to recover the valid chain or continue with the invalid chain because the majority of validators followed it. Such a bug is illustrated in 

an example on the Kintsugi testnet in early 2022

, where a missing check in two clients resulted in an invalid block being declared valid and, even after the fix was deployed, an additional related error caused validators on another client to fail to join the valid fork.

This would not only affect validators, but every application built on top of Ethereum that continues to operate during this period. A social layer intervention could choose to slash and severely penalize the affected validators, simply exit them from the network, or choose to follow a chain that isn’t valid. Any available choice here would shake faith in the immutability and reliability of Ethereum.

Geth is currently run by an estimated 86.8% of validators on the network.

*There is an additional disruptive scenario between 50 and 66% of the network, where buggy validators would still build a second chain, and it would be subject to the same inactivity leak. You can read about it in 

Low. Client developers test their implementations and compatibilities on testnets under a variety of circumstances and, with a number of clients in active development, it is likely that at least one will catch most bugs and work together to avoid errors on mainnet. But just as we did not anticipate the non-malicious bug that occurred on the consensus layer recently, there will always be unpredictable bugs that are caused by exceptional circumstances and we should be prepared for that scenario. 

In our current state of execution client diversity, such a bug would require social intervention, likely causing a monetary loss to a majority of validators, and be catastrophic for Ethereum’s reputation.

 EthStaker recommends avoiding a monoculture client setup and instead running a mix of EL and CL clients. In a mix of clients, any client pair presenting an issue can be taken out of operation without issue.

 If switching to a new execution client results in a worst case scenario, the operator will be offline for 1-2 days while they switch to another client. Offline penalties are minor and should not be a major concern for small operators.

An execution client supermajority represents an urgent threat to the network and the state of execution clients has now reached a point where at least two minority clients, Nethermind and Besu, can be confidently recommended by EthStaker for use in large staking operations. It is in every operator’s best interest to diversify their execution clients or move to minority clients entirely to minimize their risk.

Call to action: Node operators should diversify their execution clients away from a majority Geth setup

Execution Client Diversity

Integrated our ChainGPT AI Telegram bot into their community group and trained ChainGPT on the Bitgert ecosystem and products, adding another powerful project into the Web3 AI database.

Another expansion of the ChainGPT Web3 AI database by feeding it knowledge of BiSwap. Continuing to expand the economic footprint of $CGPT through a token listing and opening up a farming pool with 0.05x multiplier!

Taking the Alveychain community to the next level by integrating the ChainGPT AI Telegram bot into their group. Likewise, trained ChainGPT’s AI on the Alveychain project to continue expanding the Web3 AI database.

Continuing to usurp the crypto and blockchain industry by adding another major project into the ChainGPT AI database. Included a $CGPT token listing on the RocketX CEX/DEX aggregator, in turn expanding available trading pairs and deepening liquidity.

Integrated the ChainGPT AI into the Shockwave gaming metaverse, allowing for users to interact with it in game, while simultaneously ingesting it’s knowledge base into the external ChainGPT AI information aggregator.

Increasing the $CGPT token utility by integrating into the Cryptomus payment rails. Inversely, integrated the Cryptomus payment rails into the ChainGPT Telegram group allowing our community to conduct payments right at home!

Two pronged partnership. First, integrating the $CGPT token into the PIP payments ecosystem allowing users to do more with their $CGPT then ever before. Second, trained ChainGPT on PIP’s ecosystem and technology adding into the Web3 AI database.

ChainGPT integrates the Space ID domain extension database into the Web3 AI database and becomes capable of interacting with all the blockchain domains provided by Space ID (.arb .bnb .sei .eth and others).

Finalized full DeCrypt informational data set into the ChainGPT AI, identifying it as a trusted source for the New Feed functionality and completed roll-out of the “Getting Started with AI course”.

Cross-pollinating communities through a joint incentives venture, Dappradar and ChainGPT have united their efforts in promoting AI in the Web3 industry. Of course, to signify our commitments, the ChaingGPT AI has absorbed all of the information on Dappradar into its database.

Adding the Star Protocol into our database and training ChainGPT on their project brings their omni-chain .SNS domain name service and social media aggregation engine into CGPT AI infrastructure.

Bidirectional integration of technologies, introducing AI infrastructure to Cookie3 and feeding the Cookie3 data set into ChainGPT’s AI.

Fully consolidating the technologies of the BNBChain into the ChainGPT AI and listing ChainGPT on the official Binancian DAPP directory, dappbay.

Collaborating with Ellipal, a leading cold storage hardware provider, is giving both of our communities a chance to unite and allocating a place for $CGPT tokens to reside in their secured devices.

ChainGPT is always looking to grow its footprint, build relationships, and contribute to the industry. Many new partnerships will be taking place in the month of May!

If you are a project, or know of a project that would like to partner up please reach out to 

May Partnership Recap - ChainGPT

, an ex-founder of an NFT project I'm holding - 

, has loaned money from community members and is currently neglecting repayment. A quick inspection of her address on etherscan shows a total of 

 was loaned out to her from different community members. 

The Address 0xef14471b2f60f5e097b2ddc80f89565d9924c0fe page allows users to view transactions, balances, token holdings and transfers of ERC-20, ERC-721 and ERC-1155 (NFT) tokens, and analytics.

Address 0xef14471b2f60f5e097b2ddc80f89565d9924c0fe | Etherscan

It's devastating to see this scene as some of the lenders are the project's whale holders. It is further difficult to trust this person as different alibies/narratives were given to prompt holders to lend money. 

I was made to believe that the funds were going to be used to help advance the project (which is not true). Initially rejecting to lend because of personal reasons, I was moved by this story to continue believing in the project. Ultimately, her persistence led me to lend ETH on the promise that it has to be returned in ETH within one (1) week of lending.

I know that the money I lent is negligible to some, especially when others have lent her more than $1,000; but for comparison, this money is enough for me to go on a 3-day city trip in Thailand. 

Over the course of time, the narrative changed to a loan repayment process, and then subsequently taking out a loan. On April 7, 2023 (a month has passed), she has not complied with returning what she owes.

And on May 14, 2023 (2 months have passed), I forced her to give me a promissory note to protect myself.

"Failure to do so will result into escalating the matter to my company for further assistance." 

I have to be honest, this is the most pathetic promissory note I have seen; because any employee knows that the company is not liable for your financial endeavors. 

On this day, she is considered a scammer since she still owes me ETH passed the due date stipulated in the promissory note. Since then, she has been unreachable both on Discord and on her personal number.

How to protect yourself from lending scams

Thank you for going through my story! Now, I will share with you three (3) tips to avoid these types of scams. 

Study the blockchain transactions recorded on 

As I have mentioned, Maricel has borrowed money from community members with the earliest record of on December 2022. Noticing these minute transactions should inform you as a lender that this person is unable to pay her debts. 

An additional website to help you analyze blockchain transactions is 

. As shown below, this simplifies the wallets interacting with a specific wallet. 

Our lack of foresight due to blinded trust prompted us to lend without asking for a promissory note. A promissory note is a formal agreement between the debtor and the lender that contains the following: 

The only downside to this is that this will require you to be doxxed. 

Initially, I only promised to give $300 but I ended up giving twice because of her persistence. Essentially, lending money is also a risk especially when the justice system has not caught up with technology.  Giving more than what I can afford to lose felt like I was gambling over helping someone, and what will I eat in the next upcoming days. 

DO NOT FORGET TO PRIORITIZE YOUR NEEDS BEFORE HELPING OTHERS.

And that's a wrap! I hope my experience getting scammed by a project's ex-founder was able to give you an idea of how to protect yourself in the web3 space. 

Another day in web3...

Beware of Scammers! 

BlogChain by Adil Kazani

Delivering interesting content every single week on Web3, Security, Crypto, NFTs and AI. It's FREE, Takes less than 5-minutes to read, and you are guaranteed to learn something. Let's front-run the opportunity!

, where traditional social media platforms are being reimagined and revolutionized. Concerns about 

data privacy, censorship, and centralized control

 have led more individuals and communities to embrace decentralized protocols as a way to reclaim power and control over their online experiences. In this article, we will explore the transformative impact of decentralized protocols on social media, 

examining the benefits they bring and the challenges they help overcome

. Get ready to dive into a new era of user empowerment, security, and transparency.

I. Understanding the Decentralized Revolution

Imagine a social media platform where power is distributed among its users instead of being concentrated in the hands of a few centralized authorities. Decentralized protocols are the building blocks of such platforms, 

 where participants can interact directly, without intermediaries. These protocols are based on 

, a distributed ledger system that ensures 

 to validate transactions and maintain the integrity of the network. One well-known consensus mechanism is 

. However, alternatives like Proof of Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) have emerged, offering more energy-efficient and scalable solutions. These protocols incentivize users to contribute to the network by rewarding them with native tokens.

II. The Benefits of Decentralized Protocols in Social Media

A. Empowering Users and Preserving Privacy

Decentralized protocols shift power from centralized authorities to users themselves. In traditional social media platforms, a central entity controls 

content moderation, data storage, and decision-making

. Decentralized protocols empower users by granting them ownership of their data and allowing collective decision-making through consensus. This gives users control over their 

online identities, mitigates the risk of censorship, and reduces data breaches

B. Enabling Content Monetization and Reward Systems

Traditional social media platforms often struggle to monetize content

. Decentralized protocols offer new opportunities by introducing 

. Content creators can be directly compensated for their contributions based on the value they bring to the network. Through decentralized platforms, artists, writers, and influencers can build dedicated communities and receive fair compensation for their creativity and engagement.

Decentralized protocols provide a more secure and tamper-resistant environment compared to centralized platforms. 

By distributing data across a network of nodes

, the risk of a single point of failure or a data breach is greatly reduced. Blockchain technology ensures that data cannot be easily altered, providing 

. This fosters trust among users and enables a more open and accountable social media ecosystem.

III. Overcoming Challenges and Moving Forward

One of the main challenges facing decentralized protocols is 

. While blockchain technology offers security and transparency, it can be limited in terms of transaction speed and throughput. Ongoing research and development efforts are exploring innovative solutions, such as 

, to address these scalability issues and improve user experience.

 is crucial to fully harness the potential of decentralized protocols. Educating users about the benefits and functionalities of decentralized social media platforms is essential for their 

. As more individuals understand the advantages of user 

, the demand for decentralized alternatives is expected to increase.

1. What are some examples of decentralized social media platforms?

, functioning similarly to mailboxes. This unique platform allows users to freely migrate their social identities across various applications, while developers have the freedom to build new feature-rich applications on the network.

On Farcaster, users have the ability to send 

 addresses. By verifying ownership of their Ethereum address, users gain access to a wide range of features. These features include showcasing their 

, using their NFTs as verified avatars, and much more.

With Farcaster's decentralized approach, 

 over their social media experience. By leveraging blockchain technology, Farcaster ensures transparency, security, and the ability to seamlessly interact with Ethereum-based assets. 

 and it is building the infrastructure that will make 

 between different social platforms possible. 

 that can be used across various platforms that are part of their ecosystem. They are inviting protocols to build user-facing products using their technology and letting the user choose which protocol to use.

, was created specifically to scale and decentralize social apps to billions of users.

With DeSo, your social network is actually yours. Every bit of information shared on the DeSo network is kept 

Additionally, moving your social network, information, 

, and coins between DeSo-based applications is relatively simple.

. These include anything from music and commerce to 

You can find the full list of applications on 

2. Is decentralized social media only for tech-savvy individuals?

While some familiarity with blockchain technology may be beneficial, decentralized social media platforms are being designed with user-friendliness in mind. The goal is to create intuitive and accessible platforms that can be used by individuals from various backgrounds, regardless of their technical expertise.

Decentralized protocols hold immense promise for transforming the landscape of social media. By empowering users, 

preserving privacy, and fostering transparency

, these protocols pave the way for a more 

inclusive and democratic online environment

. While challenges such as scalability and adoption remain, the ongoing efforts to overcome them indicate a bright future for decentralized social media. 

It's time to embrace this paradigm shift and shape a new era of communication and connection.

Before diving into dapps, brush up on blockchain fundamentals and understand about the Ethereum network's decentralized nature. DEFINITION OF A DAPP The backend code of a dapp runs on a decentralized peer-to-peer network. In contrast, consider an app whose backend code is hosted on centralized servers.

Introduction to Decentralized Application (dApp)

What Are Smart Contracts? Introduction Smart contracts were initially defined in the 1990s by Nick Szabo. He described a smart contract back then as a mechanism for formalising and securing computer networks through the use of protocols and user interfaces.

What Are Smart Contracts?

Nostr stands for "Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays ". Nostr is not an app. It is a lightweight, simple yet extensible open protocol that allows building truly censorship resistant and decentralized social media platforms. According to the official repo, it is "the simplest open protocol that is able to create a censorship-resistant global "social" network once and for all."

What Is Nostr? And How To Get Started?

Unleashing the Power of Decentralization for a New Social Media Era

Decentralized Protocols and How They Change Social Media

Taylored Content

In-depth news digests cataloging what's going on in crypto, Web3, and the decentralized web. With branded snark and commentary you won't get anywhere else.

ChainGPT AI NFT Generator — Prototype Release

Safe Artificial Intelligence Development

Execution Client Diversity

May Partnership Recap - ChainGPT

Beware of Scammers!

Decentralized Protocols and How They Change Social Media

How Ethereum NFT Are Bridging to Bitcoin Ordinals

DAO Proposal: $CGPT Staking Pool Capacity Increase

SWOT Analysis: Tron (TRX)

$CGPT Community Burn Event