Cover photo

Crypto Super App

Why everyone wants it but nobody is building it

Dylan Steck

Dylan Steck

If you're in crypto or spend time on platforms like Farcaster, you might've heard folks talk about the idea of a crypto super app -- the industry's (hypothetical) equivalent of a WeChat-like app that contains a bunch of mini programs that the user can use without leaving the super app. This app's "user profile" would be a wallet(or collection of wallets), social graphs would be automatically imported from protocols like Farcaster or Lens, and crypto-enabled features would just feel built in(copy an action from your group chat, connect your wallet anywhere, tip crypto in a livestream, mint a NFT, etc). However, there's one big problem with this idea: everyone wants it but nobody is building it.

Super Apps

Super apps in general are part of the past decade's "SaaS Bundling", where companies try to build business in multiple verticals that are inter-connected and capture as much value as they can from their customers. In essence, it's each company's attempt at not only expanding their businesses, but also at creating a walled garden that makes their customers' time(and information) with their services more valuable.

post image
Uber on iOS, a great example of a super app

A great example of this is Uber expanding from just ride services to food deliveries, cargo deliveries, bike rentals, and many other services that now make the homepage of Uber look like a super app. Other great examples include Meta expanding across multiple verticals(especially through acquisitions of apps like Instagram and WhatsApp), and more.

post image
A diagram of WeChat's use cases from this article

But overall, no true "super app" has stuck in the US the way that WeChat has a stronghold in countries such as China. For quick comparison, it's worth noting what WeChat does well. WeChat users can text, shop, pay, share, and more -- all in one app and through one account. It's as if the majority of the apps we use on our phone(payments, social media, messaging, browsing etc) were built into one app and accessible as mini apps. While there could be a larger discussion as to why this hasn't happened in the US or if a super app would even work well in the US, it's worth noting that building a super app has been the goal of so many companies for a while, and it definitely seems to have inspired this shift in apps/businesses increasing their offerings.

Why crypto wants one

Especially in consumer crypto, the reason there has been so much talk about a super app is because everything is scattered and everyone is looking for a landscape/marketplace where they can grab user's attention(and hopefully onboard new folks to crypto as well). There have also been discussions on/around Farcaster about super apps for two main reasons: Warpcast's feed are starting to make the feed become a place where users can take actions(mint with warps, frames, cast actions, etc), and the social/interest graphs are starting to converge around trends even more.

post image
An example of Mint with Warps on Warpcast web(source)

There has also been a focus on crypto-focused browsers, apps/features that inherently have to have enough functionality to become your de-facto homepage in crypto. I think it's exciting to see, and there are some big problems this solves in the short term like stale wallet connections between your browser and wallet apps. I'm also excited because a handful of the teams are doing some very high quality(and net new) work, especially Roam's new browser, Family's in-app browser, and Rainbow's in-app browser.

post image
A screenshot from Roam browser's iOS beta

But other than a few of the browser teams which are inherently trying to make their apps "crypto super apps"(to an extent at least), a lot of the focus has been away from crypto super apps despite that topic staying part of the common rhetoric. However I think most builders(at least in the Farcaster ecosystem, which has been my main focus) have still been benefitting from the space's increasing composability, and that Farcaster's composability will remove the need for an individual "super app".

Why I don't see this happening... yet

As I alluded to at the end of the last section, I think Farcaster's continued composability will remove the need for any one crypto super app, and instead will make an ecosystem of interoperable tools with specific functions. There's also a case to be made that certain edge case functions want dedicated interfaces as opposed to everything being simplified in one interface, like crypto traders who use detailed apps or certain NFT creators who want the pro tooling of a creator-first minting app.

post image
A great example of Farcaster-specific composability by 0xdesigner(source cast and mint)

But where I think there will be a real opportunity for a super app much further down the line is when the composability of Farcaster starts to encompass more web2 actions. In a world where composability could help create a super account that connect all of your web2 and web3 credentials and AI will allow us to generate any type of interface on the fly, I could see there being a whole new class of interfaces and/or the ability for a super app/interface that makes it dead simple to do things across all of your apps.


In essence, the dream of a crypto super app might remain just that—a dream. Instead, the future seems to lie in the ever-increasing composability of platforms like Farcaster, where a multitude of specialized, interoperable tools can offer a more tailored and flexible user experience. This decentralized approach could be the key to unlocking the full potential of the crypto ecosystem further down the line, providing a rich landscape of possibilities without the need for a single, all-encompassing app.

Gökhan TurhanFarcaster
Gökhan Turhan
Commented 1 year ago

I saw the post earlier browsing thru Proton inbox, & just read it. I think there will be more than a dozen superapss with their own paymaster and porously walled gardens within 5 years. by @dylsteck.eth https://paragraph.xyz/@dylsteck.eth/crypto-super-app?referrer=0x36de990133D36d7E3DF9a820aA3eDE5a2320De71

kevinFarcaster
kevin
Commented 1 year ago

I just collected Crypto Super App on Paragraph.

dylanFarcaster
dylan
Commented 1 year ago

🫡

dylanFarcaster
dylan
Commented 1 year ago

an idea came to mind when i was at the coffee shop trying to stay off the laptop, and inevitably ended up writing this blog post lol "Crypto Super App" explores why everyone wants one but nobody has really built one https://paragraph.xyz/@dylsteck.eth/crypto-super-app https://warpcast.com/paragraph/0xd1195e34

dylanFarcaster
dylan
Commented 1 year ago

also available to read natively(and via rss feed) on my personal site: https://dylansteck.com/blog/crypto-super-app

dylanFarcaster
dylan
Commented 1 year ago

also happy to have gained 30 subscribers on paragraph in the past week, makes me want to write more!

Ben Adamsky 💭Farcaster
Ben Adamsky 💭
Commented 1 year ago

Great read, this is something I think a lot about as we build a composable app on top of farcaster I think we’re still really early to see how this ends up playing out!

Boris MannFarcaster
Boris Mann
Commented 1 year ago

Frames fills _some_ of the needs of a super app. The practicalities of (mobile) app building and per-data-type UX I think still drives towards separate apps. So my hypothesis is Proto Apps https://bmannconsulting.com/notes/proto-apps/

Blinky StittFarcaster
Blinky Stitt
Commented 1 year ago

Peak app design was the first version of the Uber app. Essentially one button: "Pick me up". Accessibility only went down from there.

behkod.base.ethFarcaster
behkod.base.eth
Commented 1 year ago

Was looking forward to this since you committed to write it at /commitment

dylanFarcaster
dylan
Commented 1 year ago

lfg! lmk if you have any thoughts on it 🫡

behkod.base.ethFarcaster
behkod.base.eth
Commented 1 year ago

I enjoyed both the idea & narration. tysm. But the barriers that come to my mind: 1- Scattered nature of crypto (True interoperability b/w different L1s not solved yet) 2- The maxis & their mentalities: e.g. Bitcoiners prefer Nostr, While Ethereans pick FC. 3- The simple UX (even for a single dApp) not there yet. 1/2

Crypto Super App