Trig Time

The Attention Economy

and the dark path of AI

Trigs

Trigs

It started out simple: get paid to post content people want to see.

Decade+ later and the advertising industry is pumping out over $600b per year and yet content creators are still struggling to figure out how to make it in the ecosystem.

Where did we go wrong?

As any good business student would do, lets follow the money!

The basic structure is pretty simple:

Step 1: Advertisers pay Distributors to show their ads
Step 2: Distributors incentivize content creators to make engaging content
Step 3: Content Creators self-promote to Consumers to get engagement
Step 4: Consumers see ads and go buy products

post image

As you can see, consumers have to bring their own capital to this game, but that's understandable as they are just consuming, right? Value is created by companies making products people want to buy, and that value flows downhill to the relevant actors in the system that distribute awareness of those products. It all sounds alright at first glance.

At second glance, however, there's a darker game at play here. Everything in the digital world creates data, and data is nothing if not useful at making systems more efficient. So distribution platforms figured out early on that if they collect data from consumers and creators, they can utilize that data in secondary markets to drive more competition from advertisers. Now there's a whole new value flow, but one that is invisible to the users and content creators. So much for Consumers not creating any value!

With the advent of AI, this hidden market is starting to become more and more meaningful. It is creating such a dynamic change to the entire process that it actually interrupts the value flow from ever reaching Creators!

post image

This is the dark loop that is being perpetuated by the attention economy we currently are stuck in. As AI continues to get better, and data continues to be enshrined within the distribution protocols that 'own' it, not only will Consumers be increasingly exploited by these centralized and narrative controlled platforms— another blog for another time, but also creators will be harvested for content and left with nothing. Platform owners and advertisers win because Consumers are blind to what is happening and are addicted to the dopamine rush of engaging with online content and buying new things.

Solutions for systemic problems like this are never simple. There's no one "do this and be saved" solution to offer here, sadly. We can, however, take collective steps towards building the foundation for a new economic model if we continue to focus on open primitives. That is the value of Open Source Software, Decentralized Platforms (non-extractive), and Public Goods Funding— also another blog for another time; open, decentralized platforms that are owned by the commons can provide a foundation to build an economy that doesn't have perverse incentives or hidden value extraction.

post image

In this example, all of this happens on a decentralized platform that doesn't extract any value or "rent". This is obviously an oversimplification of everything that is necessary to get an economy like this off the ground, but it demonstrates the value flow and how significantly it changes the incentive structure. Instead of advertisers paying a third party to distribute their messaging, they can access data directly from the user (with their consent) in order to issue advertising "airdrops" to the most relevant user groups. This increases the amount of value that flows back to consumers tremendously considering they got zero value before. It also, incidentally, reduces the advertising budget needed for products to target the most beneficial niches.

I call that a win-win!

It also puts the power in the hands of the content creators by letting them utilize AI tools to maximize the quality of their content creation so that consumers are more motivated to spend this new income source on directly funding creators that they prefer. No external funding necessary! This is a closed-loop system that does not get exploited in any way if anyone chooses to invest external funding into it at any stage. Everyone is in sovereign control of their identity, data, privacy, and monetization.

Everybody's winning, nobodies getting exploited! The only difference is that there aren't centralized bottlenecks that are capturing all of the value and controlling where and when it gets distributed.

If you found this exploration of economic structures interesting, follow this blog for more ramblings from someone who absolutely refuses to give up on a decentralized future!

Collect this post as an NFT.

Trig Time

Subscribe to Trig Time to receive new posts directly to your inbox.

Mike | Abundance 🌟Farcaster
Mike | Abundance 🌟
Commented 2 months ago

In the age of AI, the Read-Write-Own narrative for content is dead. AI doesn't care if you tokenize your art, writing, or data. It's not going to buy your NFT. It will just extract all the value from your work, while you sit there with an empty bag. The solution to this lies in programming incentive structures based on an impact=profit model, so that it's more profitable for AI (or a network) to reward people based on their contribution than to try and extract value for free. How can paying for something be more profitable than getting it for free?! Because of the network effects you're creating; If Bitcoin didn't reward miners for their work, but just took the PoW hashes for free it wouldn't have $2T+ in value. Yet, it's meaningless to say that a Bitcoin miner *owns* a block; what matters is that they *earn* money for mining it.

downshiftFarcaster
downshift
Commented 2 months ago

/microsub tip: 180 $DEGEN

Mike | Abundance 🌟Farcaster
Mike | Abundance 🌟
Commented 1 month ago

💚 💚 💚!

GarrettFarcaster
Garrett
Commented 2 months ago

abundance mindset

TrigsFarcaster
Trigs
Commented 2 months ago

We have to redefine ownership. I think ppl are stuck in the "trademark/patent" mindset of ownership. Tokenizing your art, writing, and data is exactly how we can use incentive models for AI to drive value back to creators as rewards, and it has nothing to do with consumers buying/selling tokenized data directly. It should have no actual retail value, no trading or LP's with pump and dump incentives. Only data flow has value, like @sheldrake was saying. Everything about AI monetization is driven by tokens already. It's just a question of who gets the value of those token tx. The owner of the data does! If all the data an AI has is tokenized, then it's ready to reward the creators! The shift has to come in accepting that tokenization isn't for user activity, it's for backend activity. The UX in the web3 future will have no exposure to the tokens in the background, making it all work. https://paragraph.xyz/@trigs/the-attention-economy

Mike | Abundance 🌟Farcaster
Mike | Abundance 🌟
Commented 1 month ago

Agree on the backend "tokenization" - as long as it includes some sort of value dependency graph. Perhaps we have to rethink not only how AI can drive value back to creators but also how AI itself monetizes. The current AI subscription plans we have will create the same perverse incentives we've seen with Big Tech..

TrigsFarcaster
Trigs
Commented 1 month ago

Now we're talking! An interesting project working on this exact solution: https://cheqd.io/solutions/use-cases/verifiable-ai/

Mike | Abundance 🌟Farcaster
Mike | Abundance 🌟
Commented 1 month ago

👀 👀 will need to look into this!

Mehdi BenembarekFarcaster
Mehdi Benembarek
Commented 2 months ago

Very complex … as it is in defining the paradigm shift from quantitative to qualitative, without faking quality. And maybe, only Historians in couple hundreds years from now (if Humanity still around) will be able to give it credibility

ColinFarcaster
Colin
Commented 6 months ago

Great article by @joanwestenberg.eth on the limitations of the paid subscription model

TrigsFarcaster
Trigs
Commented 6 months ago

I added my thoughts on the matter in my new blog! https://paragraph.xyz/@trigs/the-attention-economy

TrigsFarcaster
Trigs
Commented 6 months ago

There's a massive disconnect because Consumers aren't on the receiving end of any of the value being created in the attention economy. Consumers are used to content creation being subsidized by advertising. Without that subsidy, most can't afford the cost of actually supporting Creators. We have to fix the economics before Consumers can directly fund Creators! https://paragraph.xyz/@trigs/the-attention-economy (Also, say hello to my new blog. First entry, more to come!)

Mike | Abundance 🌟Farcaster
Mike | Abundance 🌟
Commented 6 months ago

The article reminds me a bit of the BAT (Basic Attention Token) that Brave browser uses. Was wondering if you're familiar with it

ParagraphFarcaster
Paragraph
Commented 6 months ago

Exploring the digital advertising economy, @trigs highlights the struggle of content creators caught in a web of hidden value extraction. While $600b flows through the system, real solutions lie in building decentralized platforms that empower both consumers and creators, creating a win-win dynamic.

The Attention Economy